Discussion:
More than 1,600 scientists, including two Nobel laureates, declare climate 'emergency' a myth
(too old to reply)
Ubiquitous
2023-09-01 01:05:01 UTC
Permalink
A coalition of 1,609 scientists from around the world have signed a
declaration stating “there is no climate emergency” and that they
“strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy” being
pushed across the globe. The declaration itself does not demonize
carbon monoxide and does not discuss any harmful effect of other
pollutants. The thrust of the declaration challenges the hysteria
brought about by the narrative of imminent doom.

The declaration, put together by the Global Climate Intelligence Group
(CLINTEL), was made public this month and urges that “Climate science
should be less political, while climate policies should be more
scientific.”

CLINTEL is an independent foundation that operates in the fields of
climate change and climate policy. CLINTEL was founded in 2019 by
emeritus professor of geophysics Guus Berkhout and science journalist
Marcel Crok.

“Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in
their predictions of global warming, while politicians should
dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits
of their policy measures,” the declaration says.

Of the 1,609 scientists who have signed the declaration, two
signatories are Nobel Prize laureates. The most recent to sign is Nobel
Prize winner Dr. John F. Clauser, winner of the 2022 Nobel Prize in
Physics. In an announcement from CLINTEL, Clauser is quoted as saying
"Misguided climate science has metastasized into massive shock-
journalistic pseudoscience. In turn, the pseudoscience has become a
scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills. It has been
promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agents,
politicians, journalists, government agencies, and environmentalists."

The underlying report that engendered the declaration lays out a series
of statements challenging many of the common climate claims. For
example, one of the most common claims – and repeated without question
by many – is that the earth will soon pass "tipping points that will
lead to catastrophic environmental damage, including dangerous sea
level rise, entire species going extinct, and even greater suffering in
many nations, especially the poorest."

The sense of immediate crisis has been repeated constantly by
mainstream media, including The New York Times, which said flatly,
"Earth is likely to cross a critical threshold for global warming
within the next decade."

In 2009, former vice president Al Gore famously predicted that "the
Arctic would be ice-free by 2013." He later backtracked, according to
Reuters, who said Gore was merely quoting other scientific reports.
Gore had three years earlier published "An Inconvenient Truth" the
subtitle of which was "The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and
What We Can Do About It." A documentary film based on the book earned
$24,146,161 in gross receipts that year.

Celebrity activist Greta Thunberg tweeted in 2018 – five years after
Gore's doomsday prediction – that "climate change will wipe out all of
humanity unless we stop using fossil fuels over the next five years."
The Highland County Press reported that she deleted the tweet.

Last week, John Kerry, President Biden's "Special Presidential Envoy
for Climate" spoke at a conference in Edinburgh, Scotland, saying that
"scientists who have spent a lifetime tracking this human-made crisis
described themselves as 'alarmed' and 'terrified.' As one said
unequivocally, “we are now in uncharted territory.”

"So now, humanity is inexorably threatened by humanity itself—by those
seducing people into buying into a completely fictitious alternative
reality where we don’t need to act and we don’t even need to care,"
Kerry added.

The signatories to the CLINTEL declaration say that global warming is
“far slower than predicted,” and that “inadequate models” often guide
climate policy.

The CLINTEL declaration comes at a time when recent claims abound that
natural disasters such as the wildfires in Maui and Canada, the
heatwaves across the globe and other events are driven by climate
change. The declaration goes on to challenge the ever-ready blame on
climate change, stating “There is no statistical evidence that global
warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike
natural disasters, or making them more frequent.”

As President Biden and countless world leaders push heavily for net-
zero carbon emissions by 2050 the scientists assert that this is not
only “unrealistic,” but harmful to world economies.

“There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic
and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2
policy proposed for 2050,” the paper reads, proposing “adaptation
instead of mitigation.”

--
Let's go Brandon!
NoBody
2023-09-05 14:10:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ubiquitous
A coalition of 1,609 scientists from around the world have signed a
declaration stating “there is no climate emergency” and that they
“strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy” being
pushed across the globe. The declaration itself does not demonize
carbon monoxide and does not discuss any harmful effect of other
pollutants. The thrust of the declaration challenges the hysteria
brought about by the narrative of imminent doom.
The declaration, put together by the Global Climate Intelligence Group
(CLINTEL), was made public this month and urges that “Climate science
should be less political, while climate policies should be more
scientific.”
CLINTEL is an independent foundation that operates in the fields of
climate change and climate policy. CLINTEL was founded in 2019 by
emeritus professor of geophysics Guus Berkhout and science journalist
Marcel Crok.
“Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in
their predictions of global warming, while politicians should
dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits
of their policy measures,” the declaration says.
But I thought the debate was over and there was universal acceptance
of man-made climate change?

<eyeroll>
Robert Gowan
2023-09-05 14:17:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by Ubiquitous
A coalition of 1,609 scientists from around the world have signed a
declaration stating “there is no climate emergency” and that they
“strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy” being
pushed across the globe. The declaration itself does not demonize
carbon monoxide and does not discuss any harmful effect of other
pollutants. The thrust of the declaration challenges the hysteria
brought about by the narrative of imminent doom.
The declaration, put together by the Global Climate Intelligence Group
(CLINTEL), was made public this month and urges that “Climate science
should be less political, while climate policies should be more
scientific.”
CLINTEL is an independent foundation that operates in the fields of
climate change and climate policy. CLINTEL was founded in 2019 by
emeritus professor of geophysics Guus Berkhout and science journalist
Marcel Crok.
“Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in
their predictions of global warming, while politicians should
dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits
of their policy measures,” the declaration says.
But I thought the debate was over and there was universal acceptance
of man-made climate change?
There is. These 1600 "scientists" are not climate scientists — not a single one
of them.
Still Bud
2023-09-06 09:16:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ubiquitous
Global Climate Intelligence Group
https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.32HG6HR
Otto J. Makela
2023-09-06 08:45:36 UTC
Permalink
Berkhout founded the Netherlands-based organization Climate
Intelligence Foundation (CLINTEL). Mid 2019 plans of CLINTEL and
Berkhout were leaked showing that they were organizing a
campaign against political commitments to net zero carbon
emissions being made into law. The campaign features a number of
academics and industry figures with ties to climate change
sceptics groups, as well as members from oil and gas companies.
Berkhout claimed the ideal of the organization was to provide an
alternative to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
In late September 2019 the group produced an open letter which
presented a European Climate Declaration, stating that there was
no climate emergency and repeating a number of claims that were
inconsistent with the scientific evidence on climate. A fact
check performed by climate scientists for Climate Feedback gave
the letter an overall scientific credibility of "very low", and
tagged it as "Biased, Cherry-picking, Inaccurate, Misleading".
The analysis also added that, out of the roughly 500
signatories, only 10 self-identified as climate scientists. The
document was later rebranded as the World Climate Declaration.
-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guus_Berkhout
--
/* * * Otto J. Makela <***@iki.fi> * * * * * * * * * */
/* Phone: +358 40 765 5772, ICBM: N 60 10' E 24 55' */
/* Mail: Mechelininkatu 26 B 27, FI-00100 Helsinki */
/* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * */
TruthBarker
2023-09-06 11:54:38 UTC
Permalink
More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change

More than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate
change is mainly caused by humans, according to a new survey of 88,125
climate-related studies.

The research updates a similar 2013 paper revealing that 97% of studies
published between 1991 and 2012 supported the idea that human activities
are altering Earth’s climate. The current survey examines the literature
published from 2012 to November 2020 to explore whether the consensus
has changed.

“We are virtually certain that the consensus is well over 99% now and
that it’s pretty much case closed for any meaningful public conversation
about the reality of human-caused climate change,” said Mark Lynas, a
visiting fellow at the Alliance for Science and the paper’s first author.

https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2021/10/more-999-studies-agree-humans-caused-climate-change

In recent years we have seen a huge increase in climate change related
disasters around the world with destruction of property damage and loss
of life.

Only a blind fool will say everything is alright and minimize the
effects of climate change. It is obvious, mega companies in the
hydrocarbon business are very worried, they will hire Scientists
(whores) to give us lip service. Only a fool will fall for that.

Trump during his presidency put his finger up in the air and wished for
more global warming because it was a cold day. This is how stupid Trump
is. At this point I should mention that Greta Thunberg is a lot smarter
than Trump.

It is unfortunate Trump wasted four years in the fight against climate
change. If Trump is elected again, America will burn down to the ground.
He has no sense of responsibility for the American people. In the near
future, we can be glad he will be busy fighting jail time.

Environmental Research:
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966/pdf


Please ignore the following bullshit, if you value your children's life
Post by Ubiquitous
A coalition of 1,609 scientists from around the world have signed a
declaration stating “there is no climate emergency” and that they
“strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy” being
pushed across the globe. The declaration itself does not demonize
carbon monoxide and does not discuss any harmful effect of other
pollutants. The thrust of the declaration challenges the hysteria
brought about by the narrative of imminent doom.
The declaration, put together by the Global Climate Intelligence Group
(CLINTEL), was made public this month and urges that “Climate science
should be less political, while climate policies should be more
scientific.”
CLINTEL is an independent foundation that operates in the fields of
climate change and climate policy. CLINTEL was founded in 2019 by
emeritus professor of geophysics Guus Berkhout and science journalist
Marcel Crok.
“Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in
their predictions of global warming, while politicians should
dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits
of their policy measures,” the declaration says.
Of the 1,609 scientists who have signed the declaration, two
signatories are Nobel Prize laureates. The most recent to sign is Nobel
Prize winner Dr. John F. Clauser, winner of the 2022 Nobel Prize in
Physics. In an announcement from CLINTEL, Clauser is quoted as saying
"Misguided climate science has metastasized into massive shock-
journalistic pseudoscience. In turn, the pseudoscience has become a
scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills. It has been
promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agents,
politicians, journalists, government agencies, and environmentalists."
The underlying report that engendered the declaration lays out a series
of statements challenging many of the common climate claims. For
example, one of the most common claims – and repeated without question
by many – is that the earth will soon pass "tipping points that will
lead to catastrophic environmental damage, including dangerous sea
level rise, entire species going extinct, and even greater suffering in
many nations, especially the poorest."
The sense of immediate crisis has been repeated constantly by
mainstream media, including The New York Times, which said flatly,
"Earth is likely to cross a critical threshold for global warming
within the next decade."
In 2009, former vice president Al Gore famously predicted that "the
Arctic would be ice-free by 2013." He later backtracked, according to
Reuters, who said Gore was merely quoting other scientific reports.
Gore had three years earlier published "An Inconvenient Truth" the
subtitle of which was "The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and
What We Can Do About It." A documentary film based on the book earned
$24,146,161 in gross receipts that year.
Celebrity activist Greta Thunberg tweeted in 2018 – five years after
Gore's doomsday prediction – that "climate change will wipe out all of
humanity unless we stop using fossil fuels over the next five years."
The Highland County Press reported that she deleted the tweet.
Last week, John Kerry, President Biden's "Special Presidential Envoy
for Climate" spoke at a conference in Edinburgh, Scotland, saying that
"scientists who have spent a lifetime tracking this human-made crisis
described themselves as 'alarmed' and 'terrified.' As one said
unequivocally, “we are now in uncharted territory.”
"So now, humanity is inexorably threatened by humanity itself—by those
seducing people into buying into a completely fictitious alternative
reality where we don’t need to act and we don’t even need to care,"
Kerry added.
The signatories to the CLINTEL declaration say that global warming is
“far slower than predicted,” and that “inadequate models” often guide
climate policy.
The CLINTEL declaration comes at a time when recent claims abound that
natural disasters such as the wildfires in Maui and Canada, the
heatwaves across the globe and other events are driven by climate
change. The declaration goes on to challenge the ever-ready blame on
climate change, stating “There is no statistical evidence that global
warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike
natural disasters, or making them more frequent.”
As President Biden and countless world leaders push heavily for net-
zero carbon emissions by 2050 the scientists assert that this is not
only “unrealistic,” but harmful to world economies.
“There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic
and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2
policy proposed for 2050,” the paper reads, proposing “adaptation
instead of mitigation.”
--
Let's go Brandon!
Loading...