Discussion:
Fuckwit David Harrison and "faith"
(too old to reply)
d***@.
2011-09-26 23:31:26 UTC
Permalink
I have complete faith that Fuckwit will post something stupid today
regarding life being a "benefit" for livestock animals and something
else stupid about atheists having "faith" that there is no god.
I am an atheist and I had Faith once
If you don't have faith that God does not exist then you're not a strong
atheist. You could be a weak one, but not a strong one.
You're a stupid uneducated cracKKKer, Fuckwit. No one takes your raving
about religion seriously
Whether you take it seriously or not Goo without faith a person CAN NOT be a
strong atheist.
- you're as stupid as that fuckwit "pastor" who
burned a Koran.
Probably not Goo since I'm aware it's one of God's books too, if he exists.
The Koran says their God and the Christian God are the same being Goob.
[al-`Ankabut 29:46]
And argue not with the People of the Scripture
unless it be in (a way) that is better, save with such of them as do
wrong; and say: We believe in that which hath been revealed unto us
and revealed unto you; our God and your God is One, and unto Him
we surrender.
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
That's strong atheists Goo. Weak ones don't.
I know you didn't think up that cracKKKer bullshit
yourself; someone else did,
Probably a group of people Goo. Do you really think only one person came up
with the distinction between strong and weak atheism? Well, no you didn't since
up until I just told you about it you weren't even aware that there is a
distinction.
Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit? You didn't think this corny bullshit
up yourself - guaranteed.
LOL!!! Who decides how to refer to religious beliefs Goo? That's who decided
to call people who have faith in the religious belief that God does not exist,
strong atheists.
and you latched onto it like you latch onto
all your stupid ideas. Who was it, Fuckwit?
It was whoever decided on the distinction between strong and weak atheism
Goober.
Who was it, Fuckwit?
I don't know who decides such things nor do I really care Goob. If you care,
then look it up. If you do and find out you think it matters, then try
explaining why and how you think it does, Goo.
You have no idea.
I don't know who made the decision, but whoever it was is who determined
that some degree of faith is necessary in order to be a strong atheist. The more
faith that God does not exist, the stronger the atheist... No faith means weak
atheist or no atheist at all.
It wasn't a "decision", you stupid cunt.
LOL!!! Hilarious!
Look it up if you care that much. I guess it should be no surprise that
you were unaware of this too Goo, since you're so unaware of so very much, and
the things you are aware of you as often as not you can't appreciate. Your
mental restrictions restrict you in more ways than one Goob.
George Plimpton
2011-09-26 21:00:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
I have complete faith that Fuckwit will post something stupid today
regarding life being a "benefit" for livestock animals and something
else stupid about atheists having "faith" that there is no god.
I am an atheist and I had Faith once
If you don't have faith that God does not exist then you're not a strong
atheist. You could be a weak one, but not a strong one.
You're a stupid uneducated cracKKKer, Fuckwit. No one takes your raving
about religion seriously
Whether you take it seriously or not Goo without faith a person CAN NOT be a
strong atheist.
- you're as stupid as that fuckwit "pastor" who
burned a Koran.
Probably not Goo since I'm aware it's one of God's books too, if he exists.
The Koran says their God and the Christian God are the same being Goob.
[al-`Ankabut 29:46]
And argue not with the People of the Scripture
unless it be in (a way) that is better, save with such of them as do
wrong; and say: We believe in that which hath been revealed unto us
and revealed unto you; our God and your God is One, and unto Him
we surrender.
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
That's strong atheists Goo. Weak ones don't.
I know you didn't think up that cracKKKer bullshit
yourself; someone else did,
Probably a group of people Goo. Do you really think only one person came up
with the distinction between strong and weak atheism? Well, no you didn't since
up until I just told you about it you weren't even aware that there is a
distinction.
Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit? You didn't think this corny bullshit
up yourself - guaranteed.
LOL!!! Who decides how
Fuckwit: who fed you this bullshit? You didn't think it up yourself.
What bullshit source did you steal it from?
Post by d***@.
and you latched onto it like you latch onto
all your stupid ideas. Who was it, Fuckwit?
It was whoever decided on the distinction between strong and weak atheism
Goober.
Who was it, Fuckwit?
I don't know who decides such things
Fuckwit: I want to know from whom you first stole this bullshit about
atheism and "faith". We *KNOW*, Fuckwit, that you didn't think it up
yourself.
Post by d***@.
You have no idea.
I don't know who made the decision, but
It wasn't a "decision", you stupid cunt.
LOL!!! Hilarious!
No one made any "decision", you stupid fucking cracKKKer.
d***@.
2011-09-28 20:46:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
I have complete faith that Fuckwit will post something stupid today
regarding life being a "benefit" for livestock animals and something
else stupid about atheists having "faith" that there is no god.
I am an atheist and I had Faith once
If you don't have faith that God does not exist then you're not a strong
atheist. You could be a weak one, but not a strong one.
You're a stupid uneducated cracKKKer, Fuckwit. No one takes your raving
about religion seriously
Whether you take it seriously or not Goo without faith a person CAN NOT be a
strong atheist.
- you're as stupid as that fuckwit "pastor" who
burned a Koran.
Probably not Goo since I'm aware it's one of God's books too, if he exists.
The Koran says their God and the Christian God are the same being Goob.
[al-`Ankabut 29:46]
And argue not with the People of the Scripture
unless it be in (a way) that is better, save with such of them as do
wrong; and say: We believe in that which hath been revealed unto us
and revealed unto you; our God and your God is One, and unto Him
we surrender.
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
That's strong atheists Goo. Weak ones don't.
I know you didn't think up that cracKKKer bullshit
yourself; someone else did,
Probably a group of people Goo. Do you really think only one person came up
with the distinction between strong and weak atheism? Well, no you didn't since
up until I just told you about it you weren't even aware that there is a
distinction.
Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit? You didn't think this corny bullshit
up yourself - guaranteed.
LOL!!! Who decides how to refer to religious beliefs Goo? That's who decided
to call people who have faith in the religious belief that God does not exist,
strong atheists.
Fuckwit: who
Look it up if you care Goo. Whoever it was is who created the significance
of the atheist's faith. No faith = no strong atheist. It's impossible to be a
strong atheist with no faith.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
and you latched onto it like you latch onto
all your stupid ideas. Who was it, Fuckwit?
It was whoever decided on the distinction between strong and weak atheism
Goober.
Who was it, Fuckwit?
I don't know who decides such things nor do I really care Goob. If you care,
then look it up. If you do and find out you think it matters, then try
explaining why and how you think it does, Goo.
Fuckwit: I want to know from whom you first stole this bullshit about
atheism and "faith".
It's obvious to anyone who thinks it through. It's only new to YOU because
you never have thought it through Goob. You still haven't, otherwise you
wouldn't be so worried about who I first saw point it out. It's old news Goober,
just new to you. Recognition of atheistic faith is probably at least 100 years
old imo Goo, but if you find out it's younger then let us know. Here's some info
for you to begin with:

"The term atheism originated from the Greek ??e?? (atheos), meaning "without
god", which was applied with a negative connotation to those thought to reject
the gods worshipped by the larger society. With the spread of freethought,
skeptical inquiry, and subsequent increase in criticism of religion, application
of the term narrowed in scope. The first individuals to identify themselves as
"atheist" appeared in the 18th century.[7] "
. . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
You have no idea.
I don't know who made the decision, but whoever it was is who determined
that some degree of faith is necessary in order to be a strong atheist. The more
faith that God does not exist, the stronger the atheist... No faith means weak
atheist or no atheist at all.
It wasn't a "decision", you stupid cunt.
LOL!!! Hilarious!
No one made any "decision"
LOL!!!!!
George Plimpton
2011-09-28 18:16:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
I have complete faith that Fuckwit will post something stupid today
regarding life being a "benefit" for livestock animals and something
else stupid about atheists having "faith" that there is no god.
I am an atheist and I had Faith once
If you don't have faith that God does not exist then you're not a strong
atheist. You could be a weak one, but not a strong one.
You're a stupid uneducated cracKKKer, Fuckwit. No one takes your raving
about religion seriously
Whether you take it seriously or not Goo without faith a person CAN NOT be a
strong atheist.
- you're as stupid as that fuckwit "pastor" who
burned a Koran.
Probably not Goo since I'm aware it's one of God's books too, if he exists.
The Koran says their God and the Christian God are the same being Goob.
[al-`Ankabut 29:46]
And argue not with the People of the Scripture
unless it be in (a way) that is better, save with such of them as do
wrong; and say: We believe in that which hath been revealed unto us
and revealed unto you; our God and your God is One, and unto Him
we surrender.
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
That's strong atheists Goo. Weak ones don't.
I know you didn't think up that cracKKKer bullshit
yourself; someone else did,
Probably a group of people Goo. Do you really think only one person came up
with the distinction between strong and weak atheism? Well, no you didn't since
up until I just told you about it you weren't even aware that there is a
distinction.
Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit? You didn't think this corny bullshit
up yourself - guaranteed.
LOL!!! Who decides how to refer to religious beliefs Goo? That's who decided
to call people who have faith in the religious belief that God does not exist,
strong atheists.
Fuckwit: who fed you this bullshit? You didn't think it up yourself. What bullshit source did you steal it from?
Look it up if you care
Fuckwit: *you* tell us who fed you the bullshit. I know you didn't
think this bullshit up yourself, but you act as if you did. I want you
to acknowledge that you didn't, and tell us who fed it to you.
Post by d***@.
and you latched onto it like you latch onto
all your stupid ideas. Who was it, Fuckwit?
It was whoever decided on the distinction between strong and weak atheism
Goober.
Who was it, Fuckwit?
I don't know who decides such things nor do I really care Goob. If you care,
then look it up. If you do and find out you think it matters, then try
explaining why and how you think it does, Goo.
Fuckwit: I want to know from whom you first stole this bullshit about
atheism and "faith".
It's obvious to anyone who thinks it through
No, that's a typical bullshit lie answer, Fuckwit, and it also confirms
that you're pretending you thought it up yourself, but we all know you
didn't.

Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit?
Post by d***@.
You have no idea.
I don't know who made the decision, but
It wasn't a "decision", you stupid cunt.
LOL!!! Hilarious!
No one made any "decision", you stupid fucking cracKKKer.
[Fuckwit's bullshit raving snipped]
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that 'god' does
not exist, Fuckwit? We all know you didn't think it up yourself.
d***@.
2011-09-29 22:33:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
I have complete faith that Fuckwit will post something stupid today
regarding life being a "benefit" for livestock animals and something
else stupid about atheists having "faith" that there is no god.
I am an atheist and I had Faith once
If you don't have faith that God does not exist then you're not a strong
atheist. You could be a weak one, but not a strong one.
You're a stupid uneducated cracKKKer, Fuckwit. No one takes your raving
about religion seriously
Whether you take it seriously or not Goo without faith a person CAN NOT be a
strong atheist.
- you're as stupid as that fuckwit "pastor" who
burned a Koran.
Probably not Goo since I'm aware it's one of God's books too, if he exists.
The Koran says their God and the Christian God are the same being Goob.
[al-`Ankabut 29:46]
And argue not with the People of the Scripture
unless it be in (a way) that is better, save with such of them as do
wrong; and say: We believe in that which hath been revealed unto us
and revealed unto you; our God and your God is One, and unto Him
we surrender.
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
That's strong atheists Goo. Weak ones don't.
I know you didn't think up that cracKKKer bullshit
yourself; someone else did,
Probably a group of people Goo. Do you really think only one person came up
with the distinction between strong and weak atheism? Well, no you didn't since
up until I just told you about it you weren't even aware that there is a
distinction.
Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit? You didn't think this corny bullshit
up yourself - guaranteed.
LOL!!! Who decides how to refer to religious beliefs Goo? That's who decided
to call people who have faith in the religious belief that God does not exist,
strong atheists.
Fuckwit: who
Look it up if you care Goo. Whoever it was is who created the significance
of the atheist's faith. No faith = no strong atheist. It's impossible to be a
strong atheist with no faith.
Fuckwit: *you* tell us who fed you the bullshit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_and_strong_atheism
Post by George Plimpton
I know you didn't
think this bullshit up yourself, but you act as if you did. I want you
to acknowledge that you didn't, and tell us who fed it to you.
If you care who made the decision then you look it up Goo.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
and you latched onto it like you latch onto
all your stupid ideas. Who was it, Fuckwit?
It was whoever decided on the distinction between strong and weak atheism
Goober.
Who was it, Fuckwit?
I don't know who decides such things nor do I really care Goob. If you care,
then look it up. If you do and find out you think it matters, then try
explaining why and how you think it does, Goo.
Fuckwit: I want to know from whom you first stole this bullshit about
atheism and "faith".
It's obvious to anyone who thinks it through. It's only new to YOU because
you never have thought it through Goob. You still haven't, otherwise you
wouldn't be so worried about who I first saw point it out. It's old news Goober,
just new to you. Recognition of atheistic faith is probably at least 100 years
old imo Goo, but if you find out it's younger then let us know.
No
You still don't even know what I'm telling you about Goo, much less will you
learn something about it on your own and tell other people. But I challenge you
to try Goob even though mentally you're too inept.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
"The term atheism originated from the Greek ??e?? (atheos), meaning "without
god", which was applied with a negative connotation to those thought to reject
the gods worshipped by the larger society. With the spread of freethought,
skeptical inquiry, and subsequent increase in criticism of religion, application
of the term narrowed in scope. The first individuals to identify themselves as
"atheist" appeared in the 18th century.[7] "
. . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
You have no idea.
I don't know who made the decision, but whoever it was is who determined
that some degree of faith is necessary in order to be a strong atheist. The more
faith that God does not exist, the stronger the atheist... No faith means weak
atheist or no atheist at all.
It wasn't a "decision", you stupid cunt.
LOL!!! Hilarious!
No one made any "decision"
LOL!!!!!
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that 'god' does
not exist
Only some atheists, not all, Goob. The distinction is beyond your mental
ability to comprehend, but apparently I'm the one who made you aware that it
exists. I've known for so long that I don't remember who made me aware of it
Goober, but people have been aware of it for a long time. Probably for
centuries. I've been aware of it for a decade or more longer than you have. But
then I've been able to appreciate lives of positive value for livestock for more
than two decades longer than you Goo.
George Plimpton
2011-09-29 20:35:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
I have complete faith that Fuckwit will post something stupid today
regarding life being a "benefit" for livestock animals and something
else stupid about atheists having "faith" that there is no god.
I am an atheist and I had Faith once
If you don't have faith that God does not exist then you're not a strong
atheist. You could be a weak one, but not a strong one.
You're a stupid uneducated cracKKKer, Fuckwit. No one takes your raving
about religion seriously
Whether you take it seriously or not Goo without faith a person CAN NOT be a
strong atheist.
- you're as stupid as that fuckwit "pastor" who
burned a Koran.
Probably not Goo since I'm aware it's one of God's books too, if he exists.
The Koran says their God and the Christian God are the same being Goob.
[al-`Ankabut 29:46]
And argue not with the People of the Scripture
unless it be in (a way) that is better, save with such of them as do
wrong; and say: We believe in that which hath been revealed unto us
and revealed unto you; our God and your God is One, and unto Him
we surrender.
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
That's strong atheists Goo. Weak ones don't.
I know you didn't think up that cracKKKer bullshit
yourself; someone else did,
Probably a group of people Goo. Do you really think only one person came up
with the distinction between strong and weak atheism? Well, no you didn't since
up until I just told you about it you weren't even aware that there is a
distinction.
Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit? You didn't think this corny bullshit
up yourself - guaranteed.
LOL!!! Who decides how to refer to religious beliefs Goo? That's who decided
to call people who have faith in the religious belief that God does not exist,
strong atheists.
Fuckwit: who fed you the bullshit?
Look it up if
Fuckwit: *you* tell us who fed you the bullshit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_and_strong_atheism
No, that doesn't claim that atheists have "faith" there is no "god",
Fuckwit. It doesn't say it and it doesn't imply it.

Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit? Why are you passing it off as your
own original thought when it isn't?
d***@.
2011-10-03 23:07:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
LOL!!! Who decides how to refer to religious beliefs Goo? That's who decided
to call people who have faith in the religious belief that God does not exist,
strong atheists.
Fuckwit: who
Look it up if you care Goo. Whoever it was is who created the significance
of the atheist's faith. No faith = no strong atheist. It's impossible to be a
strong atheist with no faith.
Fuckwit: *you* tell us who fed you the bullshit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_and_strong_atheism
No, that doesn't claim that atheists have "faith" there is no "god",
Fuckwit. It doesn't say it and it doesn't imply it.
"Positive atheism is a term popularly used to describe the form of atheism that
maintains that "There is no god" is a true statement."
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit? Why are you passing it off as your
own original thought when it isn't?
LOL!!! I told you it's only new to you Goober. To some people the faith of
strong atheists has been old news for years. What makes you think I know who
first began pointing out something centuries ago Goo? Do you really want people
to think you're stupid enough to believe I would just happen to know who first
drew attention to the fact, Goo? If you care, then you try to find out and then
tell me, and try to say why you want people to think it's significant. Find out
yourself Goober. Go.
. . .
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that 'god' does
not exist
Only some atheists, not all, Goob. The distinction is beyond your mental
ability to comprehend, but apparently I'm the one who made you aware that it
exists. I've known for so long that I don't remember who made me aware of it
Goober, but people have been aware of it for a long time. Probably for
centuries. I've been aware of it for a decade or more longer than you have. But
then I've been able to appreciate lives of positive value for livestock for more
than two decades longer than you Goo.
George Plimpton
2011-10-03 20:25:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Who decides how to refer to
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that god doesn't exist?
Look it up if you care
Fuckwit: *you* tell us who fed you the bullshit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_and_strong_atheism
No, that doesn't claim that atheists have "faith" there is no "god",
Fuckwit. It doesn't say it and it doesn't imply it.
"Positive atheism is a term popularly used to describe the form of atheism that
maintains that "There is no god" is a true statement."
Nothing about "faith" in that, Fuckwit - neither stated nor implied.

Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit? Why are you passing it off as your
own original thought when it isn't?
I told you it's only new to
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
d***@.
2011-10-06 23:59:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
LOL!!! Who decides how to refer to religious beliefs Goo? That's who decided
to call people who have faith in the religious belief that God does not exist,
strong atheists.
Fuckwit: who
Look it up if you care Goo. Whoever it was is who created the significance
of the atheist's faith. No faith = no strong atheist. It's impossible to be a
strong atheist with no faith.
Fuckwit: *you* tell us who fed you the bullshit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_and_strong_atheism
No, that doesn't claim that atheists have "faith" there is no "god",
Fuckwit. It doesn't say it and it doesn't imply it.
"Positive atheism is a term popularly used to describe the form of atheism that
maintains that "There is no god" is a true statement."
Nothing about "faith"
The amount of faith they have that their guess is correct is what determines
how strong an atheist they are or are not.
Post by George Plimpton
in that, Fuckwit - neither stated nor implied.
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that god doesn't exist?
The amount of faith a supposedly strong atheist has that god doesn't exist
is what determines how strong an atheist he actually is or is not, Goo. It's an
obvious fact Goober, meaning it's easy to recognise and appreciate and it's not
a secret. Plenty of people have pointed out atheistic faith Goob.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit? Why are you passing it off as your
own original thought when it isn't?
LOL!!! I told you it's only new to you Goober. To some people the faith of
strong atheists has been old news for years. What makes you think I know who
first began pointing out something centuries ago Goo? Do you really want people
to think you're stupid enough to believe I would just happen to know who first
drew attention to the fact, Goo?
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that god doesn't exist?
It's only new to you Goo. It's old news to the rest of the world:

http://is.gd/DdrMCg
. . .
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
apparently I'm the one who made you aware that it
exists. I've known for so long that I don't remember who made me aware of it
Goober, but people have been aware of it for a long time. Probably for
centuries. I've been aware of it for a decade or more longer than you have. But
then I've been able to appreciate lives of positive value for livestock for more
than two decades longer than you Goo.
George Plimpton
2011-10-06 21:35:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
LOL!!! Who decides how to refer to religious beliefs Goo? That's who decided
to call people who have faith in the religious belief that God does not exist,
strong atheists.
Fuckwit: who
Look it up if you care Goo. Whoever it was is who created the significance
of the atheist's faith. No faith = no strong atheist. It's impossible to be a
strong atheist with no faith.
Fuckwit: *you* tell us who fed you the bullshit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_and_strong_atheism
No, that doesn't claim that atheists have "faith" there is no "god",
Fuckwit. It doesn't say it and it doesn't imply it.
"Positive atheism is a term popularly used to
Nothing about "faith"in that, Fuckwit - neither stated nor implied.
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that god doesn't exist?
The amount of faith a supposedly
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god"
doesn't exist, Fuckwit?
Mr.Smartypants
2011-10-07 06:30:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
    LOL!!! Who decides how to refer to religious beliefs Goo? That's who decided
to call people who have faith in the religious belief that God does not exist,
strong atheists.
Fuckwit:  who
    Look it up if you care Goo. Whoever it was is who created the significance
of the atheist's faith. No faith = no strong atheist. It's impossible to be a
strong atheist with no faith.
Fuckwit:  *you* tell us who fed you the bullshit.
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_and_strong_atheism
No, that doesn't claim that atheists have "faith" there is no "god",
Fuckwit. It doesn't say it and it doesn't imply it.
"Positive atheism is a term popularly used to
Nothing about "faith"in that, Fuckwit - neither stated nor implied.
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
     The amount of faith a supposedly
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god"
doesn't exist, Fuckwit?-
What would *you* call it, Goobs?
George Plimpton
2011-10-07 07:05:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
LOL!!! Who decides how to refer to religious beliefs Goo? That's who decided
to call people who have faith in the religious belief that God does not exist,
strong atheists.
Fuckwit: who
Look it up if you care Goo. Whoever it was is who created the significance
of the atheist's faith. No faith = no strong atheist. It's impossible to be a
strong atheist with no faith.
Fuckwit: *you* tell us who fed you the bullshit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_and_strong_atheism
No, that doesn't claim that atheists have "faith" there is no "god",
Fuckwit. It doesn't say it and it doesn't imply it.
"Positive atheism is a term popularly used to
Nothing about "faith"in that, Fuckwit - neither stated nor implied.
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
The amount of faith a supposedly
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god"
doesn't exist, Fuckwit?-
What would *you* call it
It isn't "faith", Douchebag.
d***@.
2011-10-11 01:42:13 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 23:30:36 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god"
doesn't exist, Fuckwit?-
What would *you* call it, Goobs?
Notice that the goos don't want to refer to appreciation as appreciation,
consideration as consideration, anticipation as anticipation, or faith as faith.
Do you think it's safe to think of that as a combination of remarkable stupidity
and remarkable dishonesty both?
Dutch
2011-10-11 01:03:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 23:30:36 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god"
doesn't exist, Fuckwit?-
What would *you* call it, Goobs?
Notice that the goos don't want to refer to appreciation as
appreciation,
consideration as consideration, anticipation as anticipation, or faith as faith.
Do you think it's safe to think of that as a combination of remarkable stupidity
and remarkable dishonesty both?
That's you in a nutshell.

"Faith" is belief based on religious devotion or teachings despite an
absence of tangible proof.

Belief that something does not exist based on the absence of tangible proof
is called "skepticism".

hth
d***@.
2011-10-13 23:45:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 23:30:36 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god"
doesn't exist, Fuckwit?-
What would *you* call it, Goobs?
Notice that the goos don't want to refer to appreciation as appreciation,
consideration as consideration, anticipation as anticipation, or faith as faith.
Do you think it's safe to think of that as a combination of remarkable stupidity
and remarkable dishonesty both?
That's you in a nutshell.
"Faith" is belief
A creature has differing degrees of faith that different ideas are correct
or incorrect.
. . .
Post by Dutch
Belief that something does not exist
Means having some degree of faith that the idea is correct.

DOOOOIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
Dutch
2011-10-14 02:34:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 23:30:36 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god"
doesn't exist, Fuckwit?-
What would *you* call it, Goobs?
Notice that the goos don't want to refer to appreciation as appreciation,
consideration as consideration, anticipation as anticipation, or faith
as
faith.
Do you think it's safe to think of that as a combination of remarkable stupidity
and remarkable dishonesty both?
That's you in a nutshell.
"Faith" is belief
A creature has differing degrees of faith that different ideas are correct
or incorrect.
"Faith" implies belief in ideas despite the absence of concrete evidence.
Post by d***@.
. . .
Post by Dutch
Belief that something does not exist
Means having some degree of faith that the idea is correct.
You're really, really aggressively stupid, did you know that?
George Plimpton
2011-10-14 04:04:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 23:30:36 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god"
doesn't exist, Fuckwit?-
What would *you* call it, Goobs?
Notice that the goos don't want to refer to appreciation as
appreciation,
consideration as consideration, anticipation as anticipation, or
faith as
faith.
Do you think it's safe to think of that as a combination of remarkable stupidity
and remarkable dishonesty both?
That's you in a nutshell.
"Faith" is belief
A creature has differing degrees of faith that different ideas are correct
or incorrect.
"Faith" implies belief in ideas despite the absence of concrete evidence.
I'd say it's irrespective of whether there's evidence or not. There may
actually be evidence that supports the believer's belief, but he doesn't
care or doesn't know about it.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
. . .
Post by Dutch
Belief that something does not exist
Means having some degree of faith that the idea is correct.
You're really, really aggressively stupid, did you know that?
He sure is - he just did another empty self-referential tautology:
"faith means having faith..."
d***@.
2011-10-17 21:55:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Plimpton
"faith means having faith..."
Goober I've challenged you to try to say what you want to call the faith of
the strong atheist just as I've challenged you to try to say what you want to
call anticipation when it's triggered by a signal, but you're too stupid and
inept to figure out what you want us to call them other than faith and
anticipation.
George Plimpton
2011-10-17 19:09:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
"faith means having faith..."
I've challenged you
Goo, you have never challenged me - never. You can't challenge me. You
don't have what it takes to challenge me.
Post by d***@.
to try to say what you want to call the faith of
the strong atheist just as
You wrote an empty tautology, Fuckwit. You said "Faith means having
some degree of faith..." You didn't say anything meaningful.
d***@.
2011-10-17 21:54:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 23:30:36 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god"
doesn't exist, Fuckwit?-
What would *you* call it, Goobs?
Notice that the goos don't want to refer to appreciation as appreciation,
consideration as consideration, anticipation as anticipation, or faith
as
faith.
Do you think it's safe to think of that as a combination of remarkable stupidity
and remarkable dishonesty both?
That's you in a nutshell.
"Faith" is belief
A creature has differing degrees of faith that different ideas are correct
or incorrect.
"Faith" implies belief in ideas despite the absence of concrete evidence.
Post by d***@.
. . .
Post by Dutch
Belief that something does not exist
Means having some degree of faith that the idea is correct.
You're really, really aggressively stupid, did you know that?
I'm not stupid enough to believe every idea you have faith in is despite the
absence of concrete evidence, even if you're stupid enough to believe that about
yourself. Your faith that gravity will keep you from floating off the planet
when you go outside is based on concrete evidence for example, and your faith
that there will be enough oxygen to sustain you when you enter a building is
another. There are many, though you want us to believe you're too stupid to
recognise any, much less appreciate any of them.

All of the above being the case, the question AGAIN about you is:

WHY do you want people to believe you're as stupid as you're acting like you
are?
George Plimpton
2011-10-17 19:08:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 23:30:36 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god"
doesn't exist, Fuckwit?-
What would *you* call it, Goobs?
Notice that the goos don't want to refer to appreciation as appreciation,
consideration as consideration, anticipation as anticipation, or faith
as
faith.
Do you think it's safe to think of that as a combination of remarkable stupidity
and remarkable dishonesty both?
That's you in a nutshell.
"Faith" is belief
A creature has differing degrees of faith that different ideas are correct
or incorrect.
"Faith" implies belief in ideas despite the absence of concrete evidence.
Post by d***@.
. . .
Post by Dutch
Belief that something does not exist
Means having some degree of faith that the idea is correct.
You're really, really aggressively stupid, did you know that?
I'm not stupid enough to believe every idea you have faith in is despite the
absence of concrete evidence,
Not believing in something because there's no evidence to support the
contrary belief is not faith.
Dutch
2011-10-17 22:40:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 23:30:36 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god"
doesn't exist, Fuckwit?-
What would *you* call it, Goobs?
Notice that the goos don't want to refer to appreciation as appreciation,
consideration as consideration, anticipation as anticipation, or faith
as
faith.
Do you think it's safe to think of that as a combination of
remarkable
stupidity
and remarkable dishonesty both?
That's you in a nutshell.
"Faith" is belief
A creature has differing degrees of faith that different ideas are correct
or incorrect.
"Faith" implies belief in ideas despite the absence of concrete evidence.
Post by d***@.
. . .
Post by Dutch
Belief that something does not exist
Means having some degree of faith that the idea is correct.
You're really, really aggressively stupid, did you know that?
I'm not stupid enough to believe every idea you have faith in is despite the
absence of concrete evidence,
Not believing in something because there's no evidence to support the
contrary belief is not faith.
Everything is "faith" to an equivocating bastard. Believing that I will not
wake tomorrow as a groundhog is faith, exactly like believing that a Supreme
Being will rescue me from death as long as I worship him correctly.
Dutch
2011-10-17 22:48:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 23:30:36 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god"
doesn't exist, Fuckwit?-
What would *you* call it, Goobs?
Notice that the goos don't want to refer to appreciation as appreciation,
consideration as consideration, anticipation as anticipation, or faith
as
faith.
Do you think it's safe to think of that as a combination of remarkable stupidity
and remarkable dishonesty both?
That's you in a nutshell.
"Faith" is belief
A creature has differing degrees of faith that different ideas are correct
or incorrect.
"Faith" implies belief in ideas despite the absence of concrete evidence.
Post by d***@.
. . .
Post by Dutch
Belief that something does not exist
Means having some degree of faith that the idea is correct.
You're really, really aggressively stupid, did you know that?
I'm not stupid enough
You are stupid enough for just about anything.

to believe every idea you have faith in is despite the
Post by d***@.
absence of concrete evidence, even if you're stupid enough to believe that about
yourself. Your faith that gravity will keep you from floating off the planet
when you go outside is based on concrete evidence for example, and your faith
that there will be enough oxygen to sustain you when you enter a building is
another. There are many, though you want us to believe you're too stupid to
recognise any, much less appreciate any of them.
WHY do you want people to believe you're as stupid as you're acting like you
are?
Why do equivocate on every single thing? Is it because you don't yet
understand what that means, or are you just compulsively dishonest? Please
answer because I really want to know.

"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different, the
first is based on concrete evidence and is synonymous with rational,
reality-based belief, aka, knowledge or science. The second exists *despite
the absence of* concrete evidence, it is based on the teachings of ancient
soothsayers and wishful thinking. Honest people who profess "faith" would
not even deny this, in fact they are quite proud of having this irrational
kind of "faith", it is a badge of honor.
d***@.
2011-10-21 00:12:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
WHY do you want people to believe you're as stupid as you're acting like you
are?
Why do equivocate on every single thing? Is it because you don't yet
understand what that means, or are you just compulsively dishonest? Please
answer because I really want to know.
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
They are both the same thing, you poor fool.
Post by Dutch
the
first is based on concrete evidence and is synonymous with rational,
reality-based belief, aka, knowledge or science. The second exists *despite
the absence of* concrete evidence, it is based on the teachings of ancient
soothsayers and wishful thinking. Honest people who profess "faith" would
not even deny this, in fact they are quite proud of having this irrational
kind of "faith", it is a badge of honor.
Faith is faith regardless of how it comes to be. That's why they call it
faith. Dooooooiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeee. The faith of a person who believes God does
not exist is in no way superior to the faith of a person who believes he does.
Dooooooooooooooiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee......
panamfloyd@hotmail.com rade
2011-10-20 21:18:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
WHY do you want people to believe you're as stupid as you're acting like you
are?
Why do equivocate on every single thing? Is it because you don't yet
understand what that means, or are you just compulsively dishonest? Please
answer because I really want to know.
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
    They are both the same thing, you poor fool.
Post by Dutch
the
first is based on concrete evidence and is synonymous with rational,
reality-based belief, aka, knowledge or science. The second exists *despite
the absence of* concrete evidence, it is based on the teachings of ancient
soothsayers and wishful thinking. Honest people who profess "faith" would
not even deny this, in fact they are quite proud of having this irrational
kind of "faith", it is a badge of honor.
    Faith is faith regardless of how it comes to be. That's why they call it
faith. Dooooooiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeee. The faith of a person who believes God does
not exist is in no way superior to the faith of a person who believes he does.
Dooooooooooooooiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee......
Oh, well. At least now I understand *why* someone called you a
fuckwit, so your post isn't completely useless..

-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain

Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
george152
2011-10-20 22:47:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Oh, well. At least now I understand *why* someone called you a
fuckwit, so your post isn't completely useless..
No godbotherers ever get it that faith only exists in their world..
The rest of us plug along well without it !
d***@.
2011-10-24 23:17:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by george152
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Oh, well. At least now I understand *why* someone called you a
fuckwit, so your post isn't completely useless..
No godbotherers ever get it that faith only exists in their world..
The rest of us plug along well without it !
LOL! It must be hilarious watching you grab onto trees and fences when you
try to move around outside, because you don't have enough faith that gravity
will keep you on the planet not to keep a good grip on something that's
attached. And in case you were unaware, if you don't have faith that God does
not exist you would be a fool to ridicule someone else for having faith that he
does.
George Plimpton
2011-10-24 20:35:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by george152
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Oh, well. At least now I understand *why* someone called you a
fuckwit, so your post isn't completely useless..
No godbotherers ever get it that faith only exists in their world..
The rest of us plug along well without it !
LOL! It must be hilarious watching you grab onto trees and fences when you
try to move around outside, because you don't have enough faith that gravity
No one has "faith" in gravity, Fuckwit.
d***@.
2011-10-27 22:43:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by george152
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Oh, well. At least now I understand *why* someone called you a
fuckwit, so your post isn't completely useless..
No godbotherers ever get it that faith only exists in their world..
The rest of us plug along well without it !
LOL! It must be hilarious watching you grab onto trees and fences when you
try to move around outside, because you don't have enough faith that gravity
No one has "faith" in gravity, Fuckwit.
You do, Goo.
George Plimpton
2011-10-27 20:07:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by george152
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Oh, well. At least now I understand *why* someone called you a
fuckwit, so your post isn't completely useless..
No godbotherers ever get it that faith only exists in their world..
The rest of us plug along well without it !
LOL! It must be hilarious watching you grab onto trees and fences when you
try to move around outside, because you don't have enough faith that gravity
No one has "faith" in gravity, Fuckwit.
You do,
No one has "faith" in gravity, Fuckwit.
panamfloyd@hotmail.com rade
2011-10-24 21:35:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by george152
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Oh, well. At least now I understand *why* someone called you a
fuckwit, so your post isn't completely useless..
No godbotherers ever get it that faith only exists in their world..
The rest of us plug along well without it !
    LOL! It must be hilarious watching you grab onto trees and fences when you
try to move around outside, because you don't have enough faith that gravity
will keep you on the planet
Semantics. Last refuge of the theistic scoundrel.

snip

-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain

Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
d***@.
2011-10-27 22:46:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by george152
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Oh, well. At least now I understand *why* someone called you a
fuckwit, so your post isn't completely useless..
No godbotherers ever get it that faith only exists in their world..
The rest of us plug along well without it !
    LOL! It must be hilarious watching you grab onto trees and fences when you
try to move around outside, because you don't have enough faith that gravity
will keep you on the planet
Se
I know you really do have faith that gravity will keep you on the planet.
I'm just enjoying thinking about how stupid you would act if you really didn't
have faith in anything. Even though I KNOW you have faith in a number of things
it's amusing to think about how stupid it would be if you really did not. It's
also stupid that you lie and say you don't, as we have seen. Think about how
stupid you would act if you didn't have faith that there would be enough oxygen
in your home to sustain you when you go inside, or that there would be enough
atmospheric pressure to prevent you from exploding. Etc...LOL...it's amusing to
think about how stupid you would act if you had no faith. Some things you have
more faith in than others also but if you're too stupid to recognise anything
you have faith in at all, you'd have to be far too stupid to be able to
appreciate the varying degrees of faith you have in different things. Wow...that
would be remarkably clueless.
panamfloyd@hotmail.com rade
2011-10-30 03:11:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by george152
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Oh, well. At least now I understand *why* someone called you a
fuckwit, so your post isn't completely useless..
No godbotherers ever get it that faith only exists in their world..
The rest of us plug along well without it !
    LOL! It must be hilarious watching you grab onto trees and fences when you
try to move around outside, because you don't have enough faith that gravity
will keep you on the planet
Se
    I know you really do have faith
RE: Semantics..

Q.E.D.

Thanks.

(snip)

-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain

Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
d***@.
2011-11-02 00:35:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Post by george152
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Oh, well. At least now I understand *why* someone called you a
fuckwit, so your post isn't completely useless..
No godbotherers ever get it that faith only exists in their world..
The rest of us plug along well without it !
    LOL! It must be hilarious watching you grab onto trees and fences when you
try to move around outside, because you don't have enough faith that gravity
will keep you on the planet
Se
    I know you really do have faith
RE: Semantics..
Why don't you want to call your faith that gravity will keep you from
floating off into space, faith? Why are you so ashamed and afraid of the faith
you have in things? Are you afraid that if you acknowledge your faith in gravity
it will quit working for you, and you will float off into space? Or what???
panamfloyd@hotmail.com rade
2011-11-01 22:00:22 UTC
Permalink
snippy
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
RE: Semantics..
    Why don't you want to call your faith that gravity will keep you from
floating off into space, faith?
Probably for the same reason you don't want to learn English.

Here, HTH.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivocation#Semantic_shift

-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain

Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
d***@.
2011-11-02 22:00:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
snippy
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
RE: Semantics..
    Why don't you want to call your faith that gravity will keep you from
floating off into space, faith?
Probably for the same reason you
We can clearly see by your behavior that you don't know what you want to
call your faith, other than faith. Now we also see that you're not even aware of
WHY you don't want to refer to your faith as faith. Your position is pathetic,
though from my position it's also amusing. From your position, you're
experiencing so much cognitive dissonance that it can't be amusing to you. You
desperately WANT your own faith to seem superior, so much so that you want to
refer to it as something other than faith...LOL...but you don't know WHAT you
want to call it instead. Hilarious!
George Plimpton
2011-11-01 23:40:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Post by d***@.
Post by d***@.
Post by george152
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Oh, well. At least now I understand *why* someone called you a
fuckwit, so your post isn't completely useless..
No godbotherers ever get it that faith only exists in their world..
The rest of us plug along well without it !
LOL! It must be hilarious watching you grab onto trees and fences when you
try to move around outside, because you don't have enough faith that gravity
will keep you on the planet
Se
I know you really do have faith
RE: Semantics..
Why don't you want to call your faith that gravity
No one has "faith" in gravity, Fuckwit.
d***@.
2011-11-02 22:01:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Post by george152
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Oh, well. At least now I understand *why* someone called you a
fuckwit, so your post isn't completely useless..
No godbotherers ever get it that faith only exists in their world..
The rest of us plug along well without it !
    LOL! It must be hilarious watching you grab onto trees and fences when you
try to move around outside, because you don't have enough faith that gravity
will keep you on the planet
Se
    I know you really do have faith
RE: Semantics..
Why don't you want to call your faith that gravity will keep you from
floating off into space, faith? Why are you so ashamed and afraid of the faith
you have in things? Are you afraid that if you acknowledge your faith in gravity
it will quit working for you, and you will float off into space? Or what???
No one has "faith" in gravity, Fuckwit.
You do, Goo.
George Plimpton
2011-11-02 19:05:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Post by d***@.
Post by d***@.
Post by george152
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Oh, well. At least now I understand *why* someone called you a
fuckwit, so your post isn't completely useless..
No godbotherers ever get it that faith only exists in their world..
The rest of us plug along well without it !
LOL! It must be hilarious watching you grab onto trees and fences when you
try to move around outside, because you don't have enough faith that gravity
will keep you on the planet
Se
I know you really do have faith
RE: Semantics..
Why don't you want to call your faith that gravity
No one has "faith" in gravity, Fuckwit.
You do,
No sane person does, Goo.
Dutch
2011-10-21 06:12:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
WHY do you want people to believe you're as stupid as you're acting
like
you
are?
Why do equivocate on every single thing? Is it because you don't yet
understand what that means, or are you just compulsively dishonest? Please
answer because I really want to know.
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
They are both the same thing, you poor fool.
Post by Dutch
the
first is based on concrete evidence and is synonymous with rational,
reality-based belief, aka, knowledge or science. The second exists *despite
the absence of* concrete evidence, it is based on the teachings of ancient
soothsayers and wishful thinking. Honest people who profess "faith" would
not even deny this, in fact they are quite proud of having this irrational
kind of "faith", it is a badge of honor.
Faith is faith regardless of how it comes to be. That's why they call it
faith. Dooooooiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeee. The faith of a person who believes God does
not exist is in no way superior to the faith of a person who believes he does.
Dooooooooooooooiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee......
Oh, well. At least now I understand *why* someone called you a
fuckwit, so your post isn't completely useless..
He has the intellect of an inflatable clown.
John Baker
2011-10-21 16:16:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
WHY do you want people to believe you're as stupid as you're acting like you
are?
Why do equivocate on every single thing? Is it because you don't yet
understand what that means, or are you just compulsively dishonest? Please
answer because I really want to know.
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
    They are both the same thing, you poor fool.
Post by Dutch
the
first is based on concrete evidence and is synonymous with rational,
reality-based belief, aka, knowledge or science. The second exists *despite
the absence of* concrete evidence, it is based on the teachings of ancient
soothsayers and wishful thinking. Honest people who profess "faith" would
not even deny this, in fact they are quite proud of having this irrational
kind of "faith", it is a badge of honor.
    Faith is faith regardless of how it comes to be. That's why they call it
faith. Dooooooiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeee. The faith of a person who believes God does
not exist is in no way superior to the faith of a person who believes he does.
Dooooooooooooooiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee......
Oh, well. At least now I understand *why* someone called you a
fuckwit, so your post isn't completely useless..
Dave's been a fuckwit for years. And he just keeps getting better at
it. <G>
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
George Plimpton
2011-10-21 17:26:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Baker
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
WHY do you want people to believe you're as stupid as you're acting like you
are?
Why do equivocate on every single thing? Is it because you don't yet
understand what that means, or are you just compulsively dishonest? Please
answer because I really want to know.
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
They are both the same thing, you poor fool.
Post by Dutch
the
first is based on concrete evidence and is synonymous with rational,
reality-based belief, aka, knowledge or science. The second exists *despite
the absence of* concrete evidence, it is based on the teachings of ancient
soothsayers and wishful thinking. Honest people who profess "faith" would
not even deny this, in fact they are quite proud of having this irrational
kind of "faith", it is a badge of honor.
Faith is faith regardless of how it comes to be. That's why they call it
faith. Dooooooiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeee. The faith of a person who believes God does
not exist is in no way superior to the faith of a person who believes he does.
Dooooooooooooooiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee......
Oh, well. At least now I understand *why* someone called you a
fuckwit, so your post isn't completely useless..
Dave's been a fuckwit for years. And he just keeps getting better at
it.<G>
Fuckwit David Harrison gets better at being a fuckwit because Fuckwit
*works* at being a fuckwit. Fuckwit is his name, fuckwittery is his game.
d***@.
2011-10-24 23:18:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Baker
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
WHY do you want people to believe you're as stupid as you're acting like you
are?
Why do equivocate on every single thing? Is it because you don't yet
understand what that means, or are you just compulsively dishonest? Please
answer because I really want to know.
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
    They are both the same thing, you poor fool.
Post by Dutch
the
first is based on concrete evidence and is synonymous with rational,
reality-based belief, aka, knowledge or science. The second exists *despite
the absence of* concrete evidence, it is based on the teachings of ancient
soothsayers and wishful thinking. Honest people who profess "faith" would
not even deny this, in fact they are quite proud of having this irrational
kind of "faith", it is a badge of honor.
    Faith is faith regardless of how it comes to be. That's why they call it
faith. Dooooooiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeee. The faith of a person who believes God does
not exist is in no way superior to the faith of a person who believes he does.
Dooooooooooooooiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee......
Oh, well. At least now I understand *why* someone called you a
fuckwit, so your post isn't completely useless..
Dave's been a fuckwit for years. And he just keeps getting better at
it. <G>
Try explaining why people should think faith that God does not exist is
superior to faith that he does, if you think you can. Also, try explaining what
you want to call faith that God does not exist, if you don't want to refer to it
as faith.
d***@.
2011-10-24 23:13:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
WHY do you want people to believe you're as stupid as you're acting like you
are?
Why do equivocate on every single thing? Is it because you don't yet
understand what that means, or are you just compulsively dishonest? Please
answer because I really want to know.
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
    They are both the same thing, you poor fool.
Post by Dutch
the
first is based on concrete evidence and is synonymous with rational,
reality-based belief, aka, knowledge or science. The second exists *despite
the absence of* concrete evidence, it is based on the teachings of ancient
soothsayers and wishful thinking. Honest people who profess "faith" would
not even deny this, in fact they are quite proud of having this irrational
kind of "faith", it is a badge of honor.
    Faith is faith regardless of how it comes to be. That's why they call it
faith. Dooooooiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeee. The faith of a person who believes God does
not exist is in no way superior to the faith of a person who believes he does.
Dooooooooooooooiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee......
Oh, well. At least now I understand *why* someone called you a
fuckwit, so your post isn't completely useless..
I point out aspects of situations that people don't like to think about.
"Dutch" is opposed to considering the lives of livestock for example. People
like "Dutch" and Goo only want to consider the deaths of livestock, refusing to
give their lives as much or more consideration than their deaths because doing
so works in favor of decent AW and against the elimination objective.
Dutch
2011-10-25 06:08:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by ***@hotmail.com rade
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
WHY do you want people to believe you're as stupid as you're acting
like
you
are?
Why do equivocate on every single thing? Is it because you don't yet
understand what that means, or are you just compulsively dishonest? Please
answer because I really want to know.
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
They are both the same thing, you poor fool.
Post by Dutch
the
first is based on concrete evidence and is synonymous with rational,
reality-based belief, aka, knowledge or science. The second exists *despite
the absence of* concrete evidence, it is based on the teachings of ancient
soothsayers and wishful thinking. Honest people who profess "faith" would
not even deny this, in fact they are quite proud of having this irrational
kind of "faith", it is a badge of honor.
Faith is faith regardless of how it comes to be. That's why they call it
faith. Dooooooiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeee. The faith of a person who believes God does
not exist is in no way superior to the faith of a person who believes he does.
Dooooooooooooooiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee......
Oh, well. At least now I understand *why* someone called you a
fuckwit, so your post isn't completely useless..
I point out aspects of situations that people don't like to think about.
"Dutch" is opposed to considering the lives of livestock for example. People
like "Dutch" and Goo only want to consider the deaths of livestock, refusing to
give their lives as much or more consideration than their deaths because doing
so works in favor of decent AW and against the elimination objective.
All equivocation and fabrication.
d***@.
2011-10-27 22:46:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
"Dutch" is opposed to considering the lives of livestock for example. People
like "Dutch" and Goo only want to consider the deaths of livestock, refusing to
give their lives as much or more consideration than their deaths because doing
so works in favor of decent AW and against the elimination objective.
All equivocation and fabrication.
"the "getting to experience life" deserves NO moral
consideration, and is given none; the deliberate killing
of animals for use by humans DOES deserve moral
consideration, and gets it." - Goo

"It is illogical and inadmissible to "consider" the lives
(existence) of livestock, or of any other creature" - "Dutch"
Dutch
2011-10-27 20:46:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
"Dutch" is opposed to considering the lives of livestock for example. People
like "Dutch" and Goo only want to consider the deaths of livestock, refusing to
give their lives as much or more consideration than their deaths because doing
so works in favor of decent AW and against the elimination objective.
All equivocation and fabrication.
"the "getting to experience life" deserves NO moral
consideration, and is given none; the deliberate killing
of animals for use by humans DOES deserve moral
consideration, and gets it." - Goo
Correct
Post by d***@.
"It is illogical and inadmissible to "consider" the lives
(existence) of livestock, or of any other creature" - "Dutch"
Correct

You now have all the information you need to form a rational opinion on this
subject.

Why can't you do it? Because you choose to equivocate instead.
d***@.
2011-11-02 00:31:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
"Dutch" is opposed to considering the lives of livestock for example. People
like "Dutch" and Goo only want to consider the deaths of livestock, refusing to
give their lives as much or more consideration than their deaths because doing
so works in favor of decent AW and against the elimination objective.
All equivocation and fabrication.
"the "getting to experience life" deserves NO moral
consideration, and is given none; the deliberate killing
of animals for use by humans DOES deserve moral
consideration, and gets it." - Goo
Correct
Post by d***@.
"It is illogical and inadmissible to "consider" the lives
(existence) of livestock, or of any other creature" - "Dutch"
Correct
You now have all the information you need to form a rational opinion on this
subject.
Why can't you do it? Because you choose to equivocate instead.
I choose to appreciate when AW successfully provides lives of positive value
for livestock. I choose to appreciate other things that you people can't as
well.
Dutch
2011-11-02 07:33:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
"Dutch" is opposed to considering the lives of livestock for example. People
like "Dutch" and Goo only want to consider the deaths of livestock, refusing to
give their lives as much or more consideration than their deaths
because
doing
so works in favor of decent AW and against the elimination objective.
All equivocation and fabrication.
"the "getting to experience life" deserves NO moral
consideration, and is given none; the deliberate killing
of animals for use by humans DOES deserve moral
consideration, and gets it." - Goo
Correct
Post by d***@.
"It is illogical and inadmissible to "consider" the lives
(existence) of livestock, or of any other creature" - "Dutch"
Correct
You now have all the information you need to form a rational opinion on this
subject.
Why can't you do it? Because you choose to equivocate instead.
I choose to appreciate when AW successfully provides lives of positive value
for livestock. I choose to appreciate other things that you people can't as
well.
Your "appreciation" is self-serving bullshit.
d***@.
2011-11-02 22:02:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
"Dutch" is opposed to considering the lives of livestock for example. People
like "Dutch" and Goo only want to consider the deaths of livestock, refusing to
give their lives as much or more consideration than their deaths
because
doing
so works in favor of decent AW and against the elimination objective.
All equivocation and fabrication.
"the "getting to experience life" deserves NO moral
consideration, and is given none; the deliberate killing
of animals for use by humans DOES deserve moral
consideration, and gets it." - Goo
Correct
Post by d***@.
"It is illogical and inadmissible to "consider" the lives
(existence) of livestock, or of any other creature" - "Dutch"
Correct
You now have all the information you need to form a rational opinion on this
subject.
Why can't you do it? Because you choose to equivocate instead.
I choose to appreciate when AW successfully provides lives of positive value
for livestock. I choose to appreciate other things that you people can't as
well.
Your "appreciation" is self-serving bullshit.
All you people have is self-serving bullshit with no appreciation. Now that
you mention it, that's really all the elimination objective allows.
Dutch
2011-10-21 00:54:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
WHY do you want people to believe you're as stupid as you're acting like you
are?
Why do equivocate on every single thing? Is it because you don't yet
understand what that means, or are you just compulsively dishonest? Please
answer because I really want to know.
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
They are both the same thing
No they aren't, one type relies on evidence the other relies on "sacred
texts". There is no similarity, it's like saying that a picture of a person
is no different than the person.
d***@.
2011-10-24 23:17:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
WHY do you want people to believe you're as stupid as you're acting like you
are?
Why do equivocate on every single thing? Is it because you don't yet
understand what that means, or are you just compulsively dishonest? Please
answer because I really want to know.
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
They are both the same thing, you poor fool.
No they aren't,
one type relies on evidence the other relies on "sacred
texts". There is no similarity,
Those are just different ways of obtaining the same thing, which of course
is the faith we're discussing and you're trying to lie to me about.
Post by Dutch
it's like saying that a picture of a person
is no different than the person.
That's a blatant lie.

You STILL need to explain how you want us to believe faith that God does not
exist is superior to faith that he does. Go:
. . .
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Faith is faith regardless of how it comes to be. That's why they call it
faith. Dooooooiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeee. The faith of a person who believes God does
not exist is in no way superior to the faith of a person who believes he does.
Dooooooooooooooiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee......
Dutch
2011-10-25 04:50:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
They are both the same thing, you poor fool.
No they aren't,
one type relies on evidence the other relies on "sacred
texts". There is no similarity,
Those are just different ways of obtaining the same thing
Its not the same thing, its two completely different meanings for the same
word.

"Faith" in religious terminology *by definition* necessarily implies an
absence of evidence. That is the usual meaning of faith.

"Faith" in scientific terminology, such as that gravity will work in a
certain way, necessarily implies the presence of evidence. It's not a common
use of the word.

You're just plain stupid, I have evidence based faith in that.
d***@.
2011-10-27 22:48:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
They are both the same thing, you poor fool.
No they aren't,
one type relies on evidence the other relies on "sacred
texts". There is no similarity,
Those are just different ways of obtaining the same thing
Its not the same thing,
Yes it is, which is why it's referred to as faith regardless of how you
obtain it.
Post by Dutch
its two completely different meanings for the same
word.
LOL! It's referring to different ways of obtaining the same thing. The
"thing" is referred to as faith.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in religious terminology *by definition* necessarily implies an
absence of evidence.
That's a blatant lie. There is plenty of evidence, and often people who have
faith have it because of what they consider to be very strong evidence that God
does exist. So, as usual, as far as I can tell you are again lying about
everything.
Post by Dutch
That is the usual meaning of faith.
Faith is the amount of confidence a being has that something is correct.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in scientific terminology, such as that gravity will work in a
certain way, necessarily implies the presence of evidence. It's not a common
use of the word.
Faith is the amount of confidence a being has that something is correct.
James Warren
2011-10-27 20:07:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
They are both the same thing, you poor fool.
No they aren't,
one type relies on evidence the other relies on "sacred
texts". There is no similarity,
Those are just different ways of obtaining the same thing
Its not the same thing,
Yes it is, which is why it's referred to as faith regardless of how you
obtain it.
Post by Dutch
its two completely different meanings for the same
word.
LOL! It's referring to different ways of obtaining the same thing. The
"thing" is referred to as faith.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in religious terminology *by definition* necessarily implies an
absence of evidence.
That's a blatant lie. There is plenty of evidence, and often people who have
faith have it because of what they consider to be very strong evidence that God
does exist. So, as usual, as far as I can tell you are again lying about
everything.
Show us your evidence please.
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
That is the usual meaning of faith.
Faith is the amount of confidence a being has that something is correct.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in scientific terminology, such as that gravity will work in a
certain way, necessarily implies the presence of evidence. It's not a common
use of the word.
Faith is the amount of confidence a being has that something is correct.
d***@.
2011-11-02 00:32:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by James Warren
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
They are both the same thing, you poor fool.
No they aren't,
one type relies on evidence the other relies on "sacred
texts". There is no similarity,
Those are just different ways of obtaining the same thing
Its not the same thing,
Yes it is, which is why it's referred to as faith regardless of how you
obtain it.
Post by Dutch
its two completely different meanings for the same
word.
LOL! It's referring to different ways of obtaining the same thing. The
"thing" is referred to as faith.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in religious terminology *by definition* necessarily implies an
absence of evidence.
That's a blatant lie. There is plenty of evidence, and often people who have
faith have it because of what they consider to be very strong evidence that God
does exist. So, as usual, as far as I can tell you are again lying about
everything.
Show us your evidence please.
Your immune system is evidence to me. The "beauty" of a sunset is not, but
immune systems are. So is the diversity of life on Earth. Things that humans do
are also evidence that gods could exist imo. Very strong evidence in fact. What
we are now doing is strong evidence that gods could/do exist, to me. If it's not
to you then that's because you're unable to think realistically about the issue,
imo.
Post by James Warren
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
That is the usual meaning of faith.
Faith is the amount of confidence a being has that something is correct.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in scientific terminology, such as that gravity will work in a
certain way, necessarily implies the presence of evidence. It's not a common
use of the word.
Faith is the amount of confidence a being has that something is correct.
Dutch
2011-10-27 20:47:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
They are both the same thing, you poor fool.
No they aren't,
one type relies on evidence the other relies on "sacred
texts". There is no similarity,
Those are just different ways of obtaining the same thing
Its not the same thing,
Yes it is, which is why it's referred to as faith regardless of how you
obtain it.
Post by Dutch
its two completely different meanings for the same
word.
LOL! It's referring to different ways of obtaining the same thing. The
"thing" is referred to as faith.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in religious terminology *by definition* necessarily implies an
absence of evidence.
That's a blatant lie. There is plenty of evidence, and often people who have
faith have it because of what they consider to be very strong evidence that God
does exist. So, as usual, as far as I can tell you are again lying about
everything.
Post by Dutch
That is the usual meaning of faith.
Faith is the amount of confidence a being has that something is correct.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in scientific terminology, such as that gravity will work in a
certain way, necessarily implies the presence of evidence. It's not a common
use of the word.
Faith is the amount of confidence a being has that something is correct.
You're wrong and equivocating as usual.
d***@.
2011-11-02 00:32:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
They are both the same thing, you poor fool.
No they aren't,
one type relies on evidence the other relies on "sacred
texts". There is no similarity,
Those are just different ways of obtaining the same thing
Its not the same thing,
Yes it is, which is why it's referred to as faith regardless of how you
obtain it.
Post by Dutch
its two completely different meanings for the same
word.
LOL! It's referring to different ways of obtaining the same thing. The
"thing" is referred to as faith.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in religious terminology *by definition* necessarily implies an
absence of evidence.
That's a blatant lie. There is plenty of evidence, and often people who have
faith have it because of what they consider to be very strong evidence that God
does exist. So, as usual, as far as I can tell you are again lying about
everything.
Post by Dutch
That is the usual meaning of faith.
Faith is the amount of confidence a being has that something is correct.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in scientific terminology, such as that gravity will work in a
certain way, necessarily implies the presence of evidence. It's not a common
use of the word.
Faith is the amount of confidence a being has that something is correct.
You're wrong
That's a blatant lie.
Post by Dutch
and equivocating as usual.
You act like you want to refer to faith that God does exist as faith, yet
faith that he does not exist as something else. What do you want people to call
faith that God does not exist instead of faith, and why?
Dutch
2011-11-02 07:35:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
They are both the same thing, you poor fool.
No they aren't,
one type relies on evidence the other relies on "sacred
texts". There is no similarity,
Those are just different ways of obtaining the same thing
Its not the same thing,
Yes it is, which is why it's referred to as faith regardless of how you
obtain it.
Post by Dutch
its two completely different meanings for the same
word.
LOL! It's referring to different ways of obtaining the same thing. The
"thing" is referred to as faith.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in religious terminology *by definition* necessarily implies an
absence of evidence.
That's a blatant lie. There is plenty of evidence, and often people
who
have
faith have it because of what they consider to be very strong evidence that God
does exist. So, as usual, as far as I can tell you are again lying about
everything.
Post by Dutch
That is the usual meaning of faith.
Faith is the amount of confidence a being has that something is correct.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in scientific terminology, such as that gravity will work in a
certain way, necessarily implies the presence of evidence. It's not a common
use of the word.
Faith is the amount of confidence a being has that something is correct.
You're wrong
That's a blatant lie.
Post by Dutch
and equivocating as usual.
You act like you want to refer to faith that God does exist as faith, yet
faith that he does not exist as something else. What do you want people to call
faith that God does not exist instead of faith, and why?
Because it's two vastly different things.
d***@.
2011-11-02 22:05:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
They are both the same thing, you poor fool.
No they aren't,
one type relies on evidence the other relies on "sacred
texts". There is no similarity,
Those are just different ways of obtaining the same thing
Its not the same thing,
Yes it is, which is why it's referred to as faith regardless of how you
obtain it.
Post by Dutch
its two completely different meanings for the same
word.
LOL! It's referring to different ways of obtaining the same thing. The
"thing" is referred to as faith.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in religious terminology *by definition* necessarily implies an
absence of evidence.
That's a blatant lie. There is plenty of evidence, and often people
who
have
faith have it because of what they consider to be very strong evidence that God
does exist. So, as usual, as far as I can tell you are again lying about
everything.
Post by Dutch
That is the usual meaning of faith.
Faith is the amount of confidence a being has that something is correct.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in scientific terminology, such as that gravity will work in a
certain way, necessarily implies the presence of evidence. It's not a common
use of the word.
Faith is the amount of confidence a being has that something is correct.
You're wrong
That's a blatant lie.
Post by Dutch
and equivocating as usual.
You act like you want to refer to faith that God does exist as faith, yet
faith that he does not exist as something else. What do you want people to call
faith that God does not exist instead of faith, and why?
Because it's two vastly different things.
On the surface that seems remarkably stupid from my pov, but let's try it
out to see if it really is as stupid as it seems. We'll use Goo in our example.
We'll try your idea in a sentence:

Goo appears to have some degree of faith that God does not exist.

Now let's try the substitution YOU are suggesting for faith:

Goo appears to have some degree of because it's two vastly different things that
God does not exist.

LOL!!! Too bad. It's as stupid, or more stupid, than it seemed before we looked
at it in detail. After trying it out, we see that it's incredibly stupid. I
encourage you to try again though, to see if you can possibly come up with
anything that's not remarkably stupid. Here's the challenge for you again, in
case you're too bewildered to be able to figure it out:

What do you want people to call faith that God does not exist instead of faith,
and why?

George Plimpton
2011-10-27 22:06:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
Correct. For one thing, no one has "faith" in gravity to begin with.
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
They are both the same thing, you poor fool.
No they aren't,
one type relies on evidence the other relies on "sacred
texts". There is no similarity,
Those are just different ways of obtaining the same thing
Its not the same thing, its two completely different meanings for the same
word.
It's referring to different ways of obtaining the same thing.
No.
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in religious terminology *by definition* necessarily implies an
absence of evidence.
That's a blatant lie.
No, it isn't. It may be a little bit inaccurate. Faith bears *no
relation* to evidence. There may be evidence, or there may not be, but
the person who believes something based on faith isn't interested in
evidence at all. She doesn't care if there's evidence or not.
Post by d***@.
There is plenty of evidence,
No, there is none.
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
That is the usual meaning of faith.
Faith is the amount of confidence a being has that something is correct.
No, that's not what faith is, and you just shot yourself in your
cracKKKer ass regarding your statement that people have "faith" in
gravity. No one considers whether or not gravity is "correct", you
idiot cracKKKer.

Faith is a belief in something without consideration of any evidence.
Mr.Smartypants
2011-10-29 01:26:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dutch
Post by Dutch
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
Correct.  For one thing, no one has "faith" in gravity to begin with.
ROFL!!!

*That* is the stupidest thing you've said since you told us about 12
year old cows.
Post by Dutch
Post by Dutch
    They are both the same thing, you poor fool.
No they aren't,
one type relies on evidence the other relies on "sacred
texts". There is no similarity,
    Those are just different ways of obtaining the same thing
Its not the same thing, its two completely different meanings for the same
word.
     It's referring to different ways of obtaining the same thing.
No.
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in religious terminology *by definition* necessarily implies an
absence of evidence.
     That's a blatant lie.
No, it isn't.  It may be a little bit inaccurate.  Faith bears *no
relation* to evidence.  There may be evidence, or there may not be, but
the person who believes something based on faith isn't interested in
evidence at all.  She doesn't care if there's evidence or not.
There is plenty of evidence,
No, there is none.
Post by Dutch
That is the usual meaning of faith.
     Faith is the amount of confidence a being has that something is correct.
No, that's not what faith is, and you just shot yourself in your
cracKKKer ass regarding your statement that people have "faith" in
gravity.  No one considers whether or not gravity is "correct", you
idiot cracKKKer.
Faith is a belief in something without consideration of any evidence.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
George Plimpton
2011-10-29 05:27:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
Correct. For one thing, no one has "faith" in gravity to begin with.
*That* is the stupidest thing
No. People don't have "faith" in gravity. Gravity is experienced and
measurable.
Mr.Smartypants
2011-10-29 05:59:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
Correct.  For one thing, no one has "faith" in gravity to begin with.
*That* is the stupidest thing
No.  People don't have "faith" in gravity.  Gravity is experienced and
measurable.
So roofers shoveling shingles off a roof have NO faith that the
shingles will fall into the truck they have parked for that purpose?
They're always fearful that the shingles will float around for
eternity?

How about demolition contractors, Googerdoodle? When they put cutter
charges to bring a huge building down do you suppose they have NO
faith that the building will collapse due to gravity and suspect it
could launch itself like the space shuttle when the charges go off?

Tell us about dogs. That's funny too.
Dutch
2011-10-29 06:02:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
No. People don't have "faith" in gravity. Gravity is experienced and
measurable.
So roofers shoveling shingles off a roof have NO faith that the
shingles will fall into the truck they have parked for that purpose?
Equivocation
Mr.Smartypants
2011-10-29 14:03:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mr.Smartypants
No.  People don't have "faith" in gravity.  Gravity is experienced and
measurable.
So roofers shoveling shingles off a roof have NO faith that the
shingles will fall into the truck they have parked for that purpose?
Equivocation  
Gooberdoodling.
Dutch
2011-10-29 17:50:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by Dutch
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
No. People don't have "faith" in gravity. Gravity is experienced and
measurable.
So roofers shoveling shingles off a roof have NO faith that the
shingles will fall into the truck they have parked for that purpose?
Equivocation
Gooberdoodling.
Good word for it.
George Plimpton
2011-10-29 18:39:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dutch
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by Dutch
Post by Mr.Smartypants
No. People don't have "faith" in gravity. Gravity is experienced and
measurable.
So roofers shoveling shingles off a roof have NO faith that the
shingles will fall into the truck they have parked for that purpose?
Equivocation
Gooberdoodling.
Good word for it.
It's an excellent word for what Scooter does with his tongue to Fuckwit
David Harrison's rectum.
Mike Lovell
2011-10-29 06:14:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mr.Smartypants
So roofers shoveling shingles off a roof have NO faith that the
shingles will fall into the truck they have parked for that purpose?
They're always fearful that the shingles will float around for
eternity?
No, they *know* they will fall into the truck ;-)


faith
noun
1.
confidence or trust in a person or thing: faith in another's ability.
2.
belief that is not based on proof: He had faith that the hypothesis
would be substantiated by fact.
3.
belief in God or in the doctrines or teachings of religion: the firm
faith of the Pilgrims.
4.
belief in anything, as a code of ethics, standards of merit, etc.: to be
of the same faith with someone concerning honesty.
5.
a system of religious belief: the Christian faith; the Jewish faith.



See 2 & 3.


Gravity is based on evidence and proof, religion is not. Gravity does
not require faith.
--
Jews, Christians & Muslims
The content of your posts will show how much you
really believe God is looking over your shoulder
James Warren
2011-10-29 14:18:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
Correct. For one thing, no one has "faith" in gravity to begin with.
*That* is the stupidest thing
No. People don't have "faith" in gravity. Gravity is experienced and
measurable.
So roofers shoveling shingles off a roof have NO faith that the
shingles will fall into the truck they have parked for that purpose?
They're always fearful that the shingles will float around for
eternity?
How about demolition contractors, Googerdoodle? When they put cutter
charges to bring a huge building down do you suppose they have NO
faith that the building will collapse due to gravity and suspect it
could launch itself like the space shuttle when the charges go off?
Tell us about dogs. That's funny too.
Mr Smartpants is confusing belief arising from knowledge and belief
arising from nothing at all.

It's a decent troll though. :)
George Plimpton
2011-10-29 15:31:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by James Warren
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally
different,
Correct. For one thing, no one has "faith" in gravity to begin with.
*That* is the stupidest thing
No. People don't have "faith" in gravity. Gravity is experienced and
measurable.
So roofers shoveling shingles off a roof have NO faith that the
shingles will fall into the truck they have parked for that purpose?
They're always fearful that the shingles will float around for
eternity?
How about demolition contractors, Googerdoodle? When they put cutter
charges to bring a huge building down do you suppose they have NO
faith that the building will collapse due to gravity and suspect it
could launch itself like the space shuttle when the charges go off?
Tell us about dogs. That's funny too.
Mr Smartpants is confusing belief arising from knowledge and belief
arising from nothing at all.
It's a decent troll though. :)
No, it really wasn't a very good troll at all. Scooter, aka Douchebag
Ron Hamilton, is quite inept as a troll. Practice apparently doesn't
always make perfect.
James Warren
2011-10-30 03:06:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by James Warren
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally
different,
Correct. For one thing, no one has "faith" in gravity to begin with.
*That* is the stupidest thing
No. People don't have "faith" in gravity. Gravity is experienced and
measurable.
So roofers shoveling shingles off a roof have NO faith that the
shingles will fall into the truck they have parked for that purpose?
They're always fearful that the shingles will float around for
eternity?
How about demolition contractors, Googerdoodle? When they put cutter
charges to bring a huge building down do you suppose they have NO
faith that the building will collapse due to gravity and suspect it
could launch itself like the space shuttle when the charges go off?
Tell us about dogs. That's funny too.
Mr Smartpants is confusing belief arising from knowledge and belief
arising from nothing at all.
It's a decent troll though. :)
No, it really wasn't a very good troll at all. Scooter, aka Douchebag
Ron Hamilton, is quite inept as a troll. Practice apparently doesn't
always make perfect.
Clearly I don't know the regulars to this NG nearly as well as you do. :)
Dutch
2011-10-29 17:53:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by James Warren
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally
different,
Correct. For one thing, no one has "faith" in gravity to begin with.
*That* is the stupidest thing
No. People don't have "faith" in gravity. Gravity is experienced and
measurable.
So roofers shoveling shingles off a roof have NO faith that the
shingles will fall into the truck they have parked for that purpose?
They're always fearful that the shingles will float around for
eternity?
How about demolition contractors, Googerdoodle? When they put cutter
charges to bring a huge building down do you suppose they have NO
faith that the building will collapse due to gravity and suspect it
could launch itself like the space shuttle when the charges go off?
Tell us about dogs. That's funny too.
Mr Smartpants is confusing belief arising from knowledge and belief
arising from nothing at all.
It's a decent troll though. :)
He's not "confusing" them, he is deliberately equivocating, and it's an old
tired worn out troll that he copied from another nitwit.
James Warren
2011-10-30 03:08:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dutch
Post by James Warren
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are
totally different,
Correct. For one thing, no one has "faith" in gravity to begin with.
*That* is the stupidest thing
No. People don't have "faith" in gravity. Gravity is experienced and
measurable.
So roofers shoveling shingles off a roof have NO faith that the
shingles will fall into the truck they have parked for that purpose?
They're always fearful that the shingles will float around for
eternity?
How about demolition contractors, Googerdoodle? When they put cutter
charges to bring a huge building down do you suppose they have NO
faith that the building will collapse due to gravity and suspect it
could launch itself like the space shuttle when the charges go off?
Tell us about dogs. That's funny too.
Mr Smartpants is confusing belief arising from knowledge and belief
arising from nothing at all.
It's a decent troll though. :)
He's not "confusing" them, he is deliberately equivocating, and it's an
old tired worn out troll that he copied from another nitwit.
It is a very common trick on USENET, I agree.
d***@.
2011-11-02 00:34:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by James Warren
Post by Dutch
Post by James Warren
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are
totally different,
Correct. For one thing, no one has "faith" in gravity to begin with.
*That* is the stupidest thing
No. People don't have "faith" in gravity. Gravity is experienced and
measurable.
So roofers shoveling shingles off a roof have NO faith that the
shingles will fall into the truck they have parked for that purpose?
They're always fearful that the shingles will float around for
eternity?
How about demolition contractors, Googerdoodle? When they put cutter
charges to bring a huge building down do you suppose they have NO
faith that the building will collapse due to gravity and suspect it
could launch itself like the space shuttle when the charges go off?
Tell us about dogs. That's funny too.
Mr Smartpants is confusing belief arising from knowledge and belief
arising from nothing at all.
It's a decent troll though. :)
He's not "confusing" them, he is deliberately equivocating, and it's an
old tired worn out troll that he copied from another nitwit.
It is a very common trick on USENET, I agree.
Another common trick is for someone to say things are not what they are. For
example some people amusingly try to create the impression that faith that God
does not exist is somehow superior to faith that he does exist, and they appear
to want us to call their faith something other than faith, but at that point
they always drop the ball completely and can't say what they want us to call it
other than faith. It's a sad thing, and pathetic, but still somewhat amusing.
d***@.
2011-11-02 00:34:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by James Warren
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
Correct. For one thing, no one has "faith" in gravity to begin with.
*That* is the stupidest thing
No. People don't have "faith" in gravity. Gravity is experienced and
measurable.
So roofers shoveling shingles off a roof have NO faith that the
shingles will fall into the truck they have parked for that purpose?
They're always fearful that the shingles will float around for
eternity?
How about demolition contractors, Googerdoodle? When they put cutter
charges to bring a huge building down do you suppose they have NO
faith that the building will collapse due to gravity and suspect it
could launch itself like the space shuttle when the charges go off?
Tell us about dogs. That's funny too.
Mr Smartpants is confusing belief arising from knowledge and belief
arising from nothing at all.
It's a decent troll though. :)
Goo apparently believed, and definitely told us, that some cattle are raised
for 12 years for no other reason than to be used for pet food, and went on to
try to support the stupid idea for years. Eventually Goo appears to have learned
that no animals are raised for "that" long for no other reason than to become
pet food, but Goo STILL believes some animals are raised for no other reason
than to become pet food. The poor Goober has several huge problems with the idea
though. One that he's aware of is that he can't figure out how long he believes
these supposed animals are raised, and another is that he can't figure out
exactly what he thinks happens to the choice cuts of meat. It appears that Goo
believes they are put in the cans, and the cans are actually labeled in a way
that represents what's inside, like a nice Tbone, or Sirloin, or Filet Mignon...
He appears to believe choice cuts of meat from prime animals are being put into
pet food and sold at pet food prices, but he's too scared to say so. Another
problem Goo has that he is very much aware of, is the fact that he has never
been able to find a single bit of evidence to support his claims like:

"The fact of the matter is, with 135,000,000 cats and
dogs in the U.S., the food to feed them simply cannot
be "leftovers" from the animals bred to feed humans.
Pet food producers are a big element of the total
demand for meat. That demand is going to translate
into additional animals." - Goo

"It's established: cattle and other animals are expressly raised
to be pet food." - Goo

"Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
food. There have been several citations to support this." - Goo

Two things Goo doesn't appear to know about are the fact that there's enough
by-product from human food production to supply the pet food industry and still
have enough stuff left over to go into fertilizer, and that it wouldn't be
economical to raise livestock for no other reason than to sell them for pet
food.

Goo has claimed to know a lot about dogs. So far he hasn't shared anything
interesting from his supposed knowledge, but if it's anything like his
"knowledge" about pet food it would probably be very amusing to learn about.
George Plimpton
2011-10-29 15:17:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by George Plimpton
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
Correct. For one thing, no one has "faith" in gravity to begin with.
*That* is the stupidest thing
No. People don't have "faith" in gravity. Gravity is experienced and
measurable.
So roofers shoveling shingles off a roof have NO faith that the
shingles will fall into the truck they have parked for that purpose?
They have absolute *knowledge*, not faith, that the shingles will fall
(not necessarily into the truck.)

So, you make your living as an itinerant roofer. That fits.
d***@.
2011-11-02 00:33:09 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 22:59:10 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Post by Dutch
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
Correct.  For one thing, no one has "faith" in gravity to begin with.
*That* is the stupidest thing
No.  People don't have "faith" in gravity.  Gravity is experienced and
measurable.
So roofers shoveling shingles off a roof have NO faith that the
shingles will fall into the truck they have parked for that purpose?
They're always fearful that the shingles will float around for
eternity?
LOL!
Post by Mr.Smartypants
How about demolition contractors, Googerdoodle? When they put cutter
charges to bring a huge building down do you suppose they have NO
faith that the building will collapse due to gravity and suspect it
could launch itself like the space shuttle when the charges go off?
LOL!!!
Post by Mr.Smartypants
Tell us about dogs. That's funny too.
Yes, Gooberdoodle please do tell us some "interesting" things about dogs.
George Plimpton
2011-10-21 14:59:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Why do equivocate on every single thing? Is it because you don't yet
understand what that means, or are you just compulsively dishonest? Please
answer because I really want to know.
"Faith" in gravity and "faith" in a Supreme Being are totally different,
They are both the same thing,
They aren't, you stupid fuckwit.
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
first is based on concrete evidence and is synonymous with rational,
reality-based belief, aka, knowledge or science. The second exists *despite
the absence of* concrete evidence, it is based on the teachings of ancient
soothsayers and wishful thinking. Honest people who profess "faith" would
not even deny this, in fact they are quite proud of having this irrational
kind of "faith", it is a badge of honor.
Faith is faith regardless
Empty tautology.

Go look up 'tautology', Fuckwit. I know you don't know what it means.
You stupid, shit4braincell fucking cracKKKer.
d***@.
2011-10-24 23:18:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Plimpton
Go look up
_________________________________________________________
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=27698&dict=CALD

faith (TRUST) Show phonetics
noun [U]
great trust or confidence in something or someone
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
George Plimpton
2011-10-24 20:38:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Faith is faith regardless
Empty tautology.
Go look up 'tautology', Fuckwit. I know you don't know what it means. You stupid, shit4braincell fucking cracKKKer.
_________________________________________________________
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=27698&dict=CALD
faith (TRUST)
I told you to look up 'tautology', Fuckwit.

You wrote "faith is faith regardless...[remaining bullshit snipped]".
That's an empty tautology, Fuckwit.

You lose again, Fuckwit. I beat you again. I have never lost to you on
any point, Fuckwit, and never will. When I'm dead, I'll still beat you.
d***@.
2011-10-27 22:50:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Go look up
_________________________________________________________
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=27698&dict=CALD
faith (TRUST) Show phonetics
noun [U]
great trust or confidence in something or someone
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
I told you to look up 'tautology'
I showed you what faith means.

Explain how you want people to believe faith that God does not exist, is
somehow superior to faith that he does. Go:
George Plimpton
2011-10-27 20:06:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Go look up
_________________________________________________________
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=27698&dict=CALD
faith (TRUST) Show phonetics
noun [U]
great trust or confidence in something or someone
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
I told you to look up 'tautology'
I showed you what faith means.
No. You wrote an empty tautology: "faith is faith..."

Worthless.
d***@.
2011-11-02 00:34:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Go look up
_________________________________________________________
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=27698&dict=CALD
faith (TRUST) Show phonetics
noun [U]
great trust or confidence in something or someone
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
I told you to look up 'tautology'
I showed you what faith means.
No.
That's another blatant lie, Goo.
Post by d***@.
Explain how you want people to believe faith that God does not exist, is
George Plimpton
2011-11-01 22:37:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
I told you to look up 'tautology'
I showed you what faith means.
No.
That's another blatant lie
No. You blurted a stupid tautology; nothing more.
Dutch
2011-10-25 04:56:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Go look up
_________________________________________________________
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=27698&dict=CALD
faith (TRUST) Show phonetics
noun [U]
great trust or confidence in something or someone
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/faith_2

noun ( RELIGION )
[U] strong belief in God or a particular religion


Two different meanings for the same word.
d***@.
2011-10-27 22:51:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Go look up
_________________________________________________________
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=27698&dict=CALD
faith (TRUST) Show phonetics
noun [U]
great trust or confidence in something or someone
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/faith_2
noun ( RELIGION )
[U] strong belief in God or a particular religion
Try to explain how you want people to believe faith that God does not exist,
is superior to faith that he does. Go:

Try to let us know what you want people to call the faith that God does not
exist, if not faith. Go:
Dutch
2011-10-27 20:49:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Go look up
_________________________________________________________
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=27698&dict=CALD
faith (TRUST) Show phonetics
noun [U]
great trust or confidence in something or someone
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/faith_2
noun ( RELIGION )
[U] strong belief in God or a particular religion
Try to explain how you want people to believe faith that God does not exist,
Try to let us know what you want people to call the faith that God does not
You're equivocating again. You're dishonest that way.
d***@.
2011-11-02 00:34:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Go look up
_________________________________________________________
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=27698&dict=CALD
faith (TRUST) Show phonetics
noun [U]
great trust or confidence in something or someone
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/faith_2
noun ( RELIGION )
[U] strong belief in God or a particular religion
Try to explain how you want people to believe faith that God does not exist,
Try to let us know what you want people to call the faith that God does not
You're
LOL!!!!!! You can't even pretend to think we should call it anything
else...LOL....
Dutch
2011-11-02 07:39:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by d***@.
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Go look up
_________________________________________________________
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=27698&dict=CALD
faith (TRUST) Show phonetics
noun [U]
great trust or confidence in something or someone
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/faith_2
noun ( RELIGION )
[U] strong belief in God or a particular religion
Try to explain how you want people to believe faith that God does not exist,
Try to let us know what you want people to call the faith that God
does
not
You're
LOL!!!!!! You can't even pretend to think we should call it anything
else...LOL....
It's usually called skepticism to decline to believe stuff that has no
concrete evidence to support it, or confidence to believe stuff that does,
not "faith".
George Plimpton
2011-10-14 05:26:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dutch
Post by d***@.
and remarkable dishonesty both?
That's you in a nutshell.
"Faith" is belief based on religious devotion or teachings despite an absence of tangible proof.
[cracKKKer blabber - meaningless]
. . .
Post by Dutch
Belief that something does not exist
[faith] means having some degree of faith that the idea is correct.
You fucking cracKKKer idiot.
d***@.
2011-10-11 01:41:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
LOL!!! Who decides how to refer to religious beliefs Goo? That's who decided
to call people who have faith in the religious belief that God does not exist,
strong atheists.
Fuckwit: who
Look it up if you care Goo. Whoever it was is who created the significance
of the atheist's faith. No faith = no strong atheist. It's impossible to be a
strong atheist with no faith.
Fuckwit: *you* tell us who fed you the bullshit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_and_strong_atheism
No, that doesn't claim that atheists have "faith" there is no "god",
Fuckwit. It doesn't say it and it doesn't imply it.
"Positive atheism is a term popularly used to describe the form of atheism that
maintains that "There is no god" is a true statement."
Nothing about "faith"
The amount of faith they have that their guess is correct is what determines
how strong an atheist they are or are not.
Post by George Plimpton
in that, Fuckwit - neither stated nor implied.
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that god doesn't exist?
The amount of faith a supposedly strong atheist has that god doesn't exist
is what determines how strong an atheist he actually is or is not, Goo. It's an
obvious fact Goober, meaning it's easy to recognise and appreciate and it's not
a secret. Plenty of people have pointed out atheistic faith Goob.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit? Why are you passing it off as your
own original thought when it isn't?
LOL!!! I told you it's only new to you Goober. To some people the faith of
strong atheists has been old news for years. What makes you think I know who
first began pointing out something centuries ago Goo? Do you really want people
to think you're stupid enough to believe I would just happen to know who first
drew attention to the fact, Goo?
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that god doesn't exist?
http://is.gd/DdrMCg
. . .
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god"
doesn't exist, Fuckwit?
You are WAY behind Goober. The Google search I gave you should have taught
you, but I'll teach you now part of what a search would have taught you, which
is that plenty of people are aware of atheistic faith:

atheistic faithAdvanced search
SearchAbout 17,400,000 results (0.24 seconds)

Atheist Faith at Amazon - Low Prices on Atheist faith
www.amazon.com/books
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
amazon.com is rated
6,383 reviews
Qualified orders over $25 ship free Showing results for atheist faith
Search instead for atheistic faith


Search ResultsAtheism is Based on Faith? Atheism Myths: Atheists Can't Disprove
...atheism.about.com/od/atheismmyths/a/faith.htmCached - Similar
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Many theists argue that atheism must be as much of a faith as theism because
atheists also cannot prove God doesn't exist. This is a mistake on multiple
levels: ...
Amazon.com: I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist ...www.amazon.com › ... ›
Christianity › Christian LivingCached - Similar
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
238 reviews - $8.98 - In stock

"I already know ten people to whom I will give this book. It's truly a Godsend."
– David Limbaugh, author, Absolute Power and Persecution, from the Foreword "I
...
Response to: "Atheists have faith, just like theists." - YouTube


You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Feb 22, 2008 - 11 min - Uploaded by PiroNiro
Matt Dillahunty responds to the claim that people need as much faith to NOT
believe in god, as to believe in god. Credit ...

More videos for atheist faith »
Unreasonable Faith: A reasonable blog on atheism, religion
...unreasonablefaith.com/Cached - Similar
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
7 hours ago – Reasonable Thoughts on Religion, Science, Skepticism, and Atheism.
Get more results from the past 24 hours
Faith of an Atheistwww.uucpa.org/sermons_02-03/sermon020310.htmlCached - Similar
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Faith of an Atheist Reverend Darcey Laine March 10, 2002. Palo Alto, CA.
Meditation. "The Human Task". We have ceased to invoke the gods, who were human
...
Panelists at discussion on atheism: No faith, no problem |
MLive.comwww.mlive.com › Grand Rapids NewsCached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Sep 15, 2011 – They explain atheism has not led to life of sadness.
An Atheist Says He Knows There Is No God|Atheist States There Is
...carm.org/atheist-says-he-knows-there-no-godCached - Similar
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Also, he and I discussed faith a bit towards the end. Atheist: As to religious
arguments I haven't found one that can stand up to the logic of atheism. Matt:
Are you ...
I Don&#39;t Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist - RichardDawkins
...richarddawkins.net/articles/1786Cached - Similar
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Oct 23, 2007 – "Being an atheist takes as much faith as being a theist", or the
less aggressive version: "Atheism is a belief too", which sometimes dwindles ...
Atheism Requires No Faith -
Skepticoskeptico.blogs.com/skeptico/2008/07/atheism-requires-no-faith.htmlCached
- Similar
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Jul 16, 2008 – This is another piece of flawed reasoning the religious have been
throwing around a lot recently – “it requires more faith to be an atheist than
to ...
Atheism Does NOT Require
Faithwww.atheistrev.com/2008/01/atheism-does-not-require-faith.htmlCached -
Similar
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Jan 10, 2008 – Next to the claim that atheists are evil because some god is
required for morality, insisting that atheism requires faith seems to be a
second ...
News for atheist faithThere is a gaping, atheist-shaped hole in the interfaith
movement

The Guardian - 15 hours ago
We need more atheist voices at interfaith events. Of course atheism isn't a
faith, but "inter-philosophical outlook" just doesn't fit on the T-shirts. ...2
related articlesDawkins attacks faith teaching

BBC News - 9 related articles
George Plimpton
2011-10-11 02:14:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Fuckwit: *you* tell us who fed you the bullshit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_and_strong_atheism
No, that doesn't claim that atheists have "faith" there is no "god",
Fuckwit. It doesn't say it and it doesn't imply it.
"Positive atheism is a term popularly used to describe the form of atheism that
maintains that "There is no god" is a true statement."
Nothing about "faith" in that, Fuckwit - neither stated nor implied.
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
The amount of faith a
Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit? Tell us now.
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit? Why are you passing it off as your
own original thought when it isn't?
LOL!!! I told you it's only new to you Goober. To some people the faith of
strong atheists has been old news for years. What makes you think I know who
first began pointing out something centuries ago Goo? Do you really want people
to think you're stupid enough to believe I would just happen to know who first
drew attention to the fact, Goo?
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
http://is.gd/DdrMCg
. . .
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god"
doesn't exist, Fuckwit?
You are WAY behind
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god" does
not exist, Fuckwit? You didn't have the thought yourself - we all know
that.
d***@.
2011-10-13 23:37:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
LOL!!! Who decides how to refer to religious beliefs Goo? That's who decided
to call people who have faith in the religious belief that God does not exist,
strong atheists.
Fuckwit: who
Look it up if you care Goo. Whoever it was is who created the significance
of the atheist's faith. No faith = no strong atheist. It's impossible to be a
strong atheist with no faith.
Fuckwit: *you* tell us who fed you the bullshit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_and_strong_atheism
No, that doesn't claim that atheists have "faith" there is no "god",
Fuckwit. It doesn't say it and it doesn't imply it.
"Positive atheism is a term popularly used to describe the form of atheism that
maintains that "There is no god" is a true statement."
Nothing about "faith"
The amount of faith they have that their guess is correct is what determines
how strong an atheist they are or are not.
Post by George Plimpton
in that, Fuckwit - neither stated nor implied.
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
The amount of faith a supposedly strong atheist has that god doesn't exist
is what determines how strong an atheist he actually is or is not, Goo. It's an
obvious fact Goober, meaning it's easy to recognise and appreciate and it's not
a secret. Plenty of people have pointed out atheistic faith Goob.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit? Why are you passing it off as your
own original thought when it isn't?
LOL!!! I told you it's only new to you Goober. To some people the faith of
strong atheists has been old news for years. What makes you think I know who
first began pointing out something centuries ago Goo? Do you really want people
to think you're stupid enough to believe I would just happen to know who first
drew attention to the fact, Goo?
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
http://is.gd/DdrMCg
. . .
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god"
doesn't exist, Fuckwit?
You are WAY behind Goober. The Google search I gave you should have taught
you, but I'll teach you now part of what a search would have taught you, which
. . .
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god" does
not exist, Fuckwit? You didn't have the thought yourself - we all know
that.
It's old news Goo. I've been aware of it for ten years or more Goober, and
no doubt there are people who have known about it for a lot longer than that. I
argued with some of these same supposed atheists about this same thing years ago
Goober, and satanists too, but I didn't link them to the animal group because I
knew/know topics like that are too much for you. It blows your little mind just
to find out that other people have been aware of it for decades, or
centuries.... Anyway Goo, the stronger the faith the stronger the atheist, the
weaker the faith the weaker the atheist, and no faith means no strong atheist at
all.
George Plimpton
2011-10-13 21:00:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
LOL!!! Who decides how to refer to religious beliefs Goo? That's who decided
to call people who have faith in the religious belief that God does not exist,
strong atheists.
Fuckwit: who
Look it up if you care Goo. Whoever it was is who created the significance
of the atheist's faith. No faith = no strong atheist. It's impossible to be a
strong atheist with no faith.
Fuckwit: *you* tell us who fed you the bullshit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_and_strong_atheism
No, that doesn't claim that atheists have "faith" there is no "god",
Fuckwit. It doesn't say it and it doesn't imply it.
"Positive atheism is a term popularly used to describe the form of atheism that
maintains that "There is no god" is a true statement."
Nothing about "faith"
The amount of faith they have that their guess is correct is what determines
how strong an atheist they are or are not.
Post by George Plimpton
in that, Fuckwit - neither stated nor implied.
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
The amount of faith a supposedly strong atheist has that god doesn't exist
is what determines how strong an atheist he actually is or is not, Goo. It's an
obvious fact Goober, meaning it's easy to recognise and appreciate and it's not
a secret. Plenty of people have pointed out atheistic faith Goob.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit? Why are you passing it off as your
own original thought when it isn't?
LOL!!! I told you it's only new to you Goober. To some people the faith of
strong atheists has been old news for years. What makes you think I know who
first began pointing out something centuries ago Goo? Do you really want people
to think you're stupid enough to believe I would just happen to know who first
drew attention to the fact, Goo?
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
http://is.gd/DdrMCg
. . .
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god"
doesn't exist, Fuckwit?
You are WAY behind Goober. The Google search I gave you should have taught
you, but I'll teach you now part of what a search would have taught you, which
. . .
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god" does
not exist, Fuckwit? You didn't have the thought yourself - we all know
that.
It's old news
Who fed it to you, Fuckwit? Who fed you the bullshit?
d***@.
2011-10-17 22:20:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
LOL!!! Who decides how to refer to religious beliefs Goo? That's who decided
to call people who have faith in the religious belief that God does not exist,
strong atheists.
Fuckwit: who
Look it up if you care Goo. Whoever it was is who created the significance
of the atheist's faith. No faith = no strong atheist. It's impossible to be a
strong atheist with no faith.
Fuckwit: *you* tell us who fed you the bullshit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_and_strong_atheism
No, that doesn't claim that atheists have "faith" there is no "god",
Fuckwit. It doesn't say it and it doesn't imply it.
"Positive atheism is a term popularly used to describe the form of atheism that
maintains that "There is no god" is a true statement."
Nothing about "faith"
The amount of faith they have that their guess is correct is what determines
how strong an atheist they are or are not.
Post by George Plimpton
in that, Fuckwit - neither stated nor implied.
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
The amount of faith a supposedly strong atheist has that god doesn't exist
is what determines how strong an atheist he actually is or is not, Goo. It's an
obvious fact Goober, meaning it's easy to recognise and appreciate and it's not
a secret. Plenty of people have pointed out atheistic faith Goob.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit? Why are you passing it off as your
own original thought when it isn't?
LOL!!! I told you it's only new to you Goober. To some people the faith of
strong atheists has been old news for years. What makes you think I know who
first began pointing out something centuries ago Goo? Do you really want people
to think you're stupid enough to believe I would just happen to know who first
drew attention to the fact, Goo?
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
http://is.gd/DdrMCg
. . .
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god"
doesn't exist, Fuckwit?
You are WAY behind Goober. The Google search I gave you should have taught
you, but I'll teach you now part of what a search would have taught you, which
. . .
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god" does
not exist, Fuckwit? You didn't have the thought yourself - we all know
that.
It's old news Goo. I've been aware of it for ten years or more Goober, and
no doubt there are people who have known about it for a lot longer than that. I
argued with some of these same supposed atheists about this same thing years ago
Goober, and satanists too, but I didn't link them to the animal group because I
knew/know topics like that are too much for you. It blows your little mind just
to find out that other people have been aware of it for decades, or
centuries.... Anyway Goo, the stronger the faith the stronger the atheist, the
weaker the faith the weaker the atheist, and no faith means no strong atheist at
all.
Who fed it to you, Fuckwit? Who fed you the bullshit?
No one fed it to me Goo, and as I showed you more than once it's old news to
many people other than you. One thing about it Gooberdoodle, even though it's
been so long that I can't remember who or what first made me aware of atheistic
faith specifically, we can certainly tell what made you aware of it for the
first time. Me.

As I pointed out to you from the start of this topic, if you want to try to
find out when it became known for the first time then YOU try to find out,
because I don't care. I suspect it was first recognised centuries ago Goob, but
I'm not going to try to find that out for you. One of the things I showed you
mentioned ancient Rome or something, didn't it Goo? Whether or no, these days
it's easy to see that atheistic faith is familiar to plenty of people. And it
surely should be too Goob, since it could hardly be more obvious or more
necessary for strong atheists.
George Plimpton
2011-10-17 19:25:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
LOL!!! Who decides how to refer to religious beliefs Goo? That's who decided
to call people who have faith in the religious belief that God does not exist,
strong atheists.
Fuckwit: who
Look it up if you care Goo. Whoever it was is who created the significance
of the atheist's faith. No faith = no strong atheist. It's impossible to be a
strong atheist with no faith.
Fuckwit: *you* tell us who fed you the bullshit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_and_strong_atheism
No, that doesn't claim that atheists have "faith" there is no "god",
Fuckwit. It doesn't say it and it doesn't imply it.
"Positive atheism is a term popularly used to
Nothing about "faith" in that, Fuckwit - neither stated nor implied.
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
The amount of faith a
No.
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit? Why are you passing it off as your
own original thought when it isn't?
I told you it's only new to
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
It's only new to
. . .
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god"
doesn't exist, Fuckwit?
You are WAY
. . .
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god" does
not exist, Fuckwit? You didn't have the thought yourself - we all know
that.
It's old news
Who fed it to you, Fuckwit? Who fed you the bullshit?
No one fed it to me
That's a lie, Fuckwit. You didn't think of it yourself, and you didn't
find it by doing research. Some other fuckwitted true believer fed it
to you, and you thought it was clever.

Who was it, Fuckwit?
d***@.
2011-10-21 00:14:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
LOL!!! Who decides how to refer to religious beliefs Goo? That's who decided
to call people who have faith in the religious belief that God does not exist,
strong atheists.
Fuckwit: who
Look it up if you care Goo. Whoever it was is who created the significance
of the atheist's faith. No faith = no strong atheist. It's impossible to be a
strong atheist with no faith.
Fuckwit: *you* tell us who fed you the bullshit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_and_strong_atheism
No, that doesn't claim that atheists have "faith" there is no "god",
Fuckwit. It doesn't say it and it doesn't imply it.
"Positive atheism is a term popularly used to describe the form of atheism that
maintains that "There is no god" is a true statement."
Nothing about "faith"
The amount of faith they have that their guess is correct is what determines
how strong an atheist they are or are not.
Post by George Plimpton
in that, Fuckwit - neither stated nor implied.
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
The amount of faith a supposedly strong atheist has that god doesn't exist
is what determines how strong an atheist he actually is or is not, Goo. It's an
obvious fact Goober, meaning it's easy to recognise and appreciate and it's not
a secret. Plenty of people have pointed out atheistic faith Goob.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit? Why are you passing it off as your
own original thought when it isn't?
LOL!!! I told you it's only new to you Goober. To some people the faith of
strong atheists has been old news for years. What makes you think I know who
first began pointing out something centuries ago Goo? Do you really want people
to think you're stupid enough to believe I would just happen to know who first
drew attention to the fact, Goo?
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
http://is.gd/DdrMCg
. . .
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god"
doesn't exist, Fuckwit?
You are WAY behind Goober. The Google search I gave you should have taught
you, but I'll teach you now part of what a search would have taught you, which
. . .
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god" does
not exist, Fuckwit? You didn't have the thought yourself - we all know
that.
It's old news Goo. I've been aware of it for ten years or more Goober, and
no doubt there are people who have known about it for a lot longer than that. I
argued with some of these same supposed atheists about this same thing years ago
Goober, and satanists too, but I didn't link them to the animal group because I
knew/know topics like that are too much for you. It blows your little mind just
to find out that other people have been aware of it for decades, or
centuries.... Anyway Goo, the stronger the faith the stronger the atheist, the
weaker the faith the weaker the atheist, and no faith means no strong atheist at
all.
Who fed it to you, Fuckwit? Who fed you the bullshit?
No one fed it to me Goo, and as I showed you more than once it's old news to
many people other than you. One thing about it Gooberdoodle, even though it's
been so long that I can't remember who or what first made me aware of atheistic
faith specifically, we can certainly tell what made you aware of it for the
first time. Me.
That's a lie
Obviously not Goober. Your behavior makes it clear that you never knew about
atheistic faith until I made you aware of it.
Post by George Plimpton
, Fuckwit. You didn't think of it yourself
I pointed that out to you with plenty of examples of other people being
aware of it too Goo.
Post by George Plimpton
, and you didn't
find it by doing research. Some other fuckwitted true believer fed it
to you, and you thought it was clever.
Who was it, Fuckwit?
LOL!!! You're hilarious Goob. Since you weren't aware of atheistic faith
here's another one you're probably not aware of: in his "Satanic Bible", Howard
Levey (look it up Goo) encouraged people to believe God and Satan do *not*
exist. I learned that by reading the book Goo, and later found that there are a
lot of people who are aware of it. Eventually you will get more comfortable with
the idea that a lot of people know about atheistic faith and were discussing it
for years before you ever learned anything about it.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
As I pointed out to you from the start of this topic, if you want to try to
find out when it became known for the first time then YOU try to find out,
because I don't care. I suspect it was first recognised centuries ago Goob, but
I'm not going to try to find that out for you. One of the things I showed you
mentioned ancient Rome or something, didn't it Goo? Whether or no, these days
it's easy to see that atheistic faith is familiar to plenty of people. And it
surely should be too Goob, since it could hardly be more obvious or more
necessary for strong atheists.
George Plimpton
2011-10-20 23:11:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@.
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
LOL!!! Who decides how to
Fuckwit: who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that 'god' doesn't exist?
Look it up if you
Fuckwit: *you* tell us who fed you the bullshit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_and_strong_atheism
No, that doesn't claim that atheists have "faith" there is no "god",
Fuckwit. It doesn't say it and it doesn't imply it.
"Positive atheism is a
Nothing about "faith" in that, Fuckwit - neither stated nor implied.
The amount of faith
Tell us who fed you this corny bullshit about atheists having "faith"
that 'god' doesn't exist, Fuckwit.
Post by d***@.
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Post by d***@.
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit? Why are you passing it off as your
own original thought when it isn't?
LOL!!! I told you it's only new to
Fuckwit, who fed you this bullshit about atheists having "faith" that
god doesn't exist?
It's only new to
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god"
doesn't exist, Fuckwit?
You are
. . .
Post by George Plimpton
Who fed you the bullshit about atheists having "faith" that "god" does
not exist, Fuckwit? You didn't have the thought yourself - we all know
that.
It's old news
Who fed it to you, Fuckwit? Who fed you the bullshit?
No one fed it to me
That's a lie, Fuckwit. You didn't think of it yourself, and you didn't find it by doing research. Some other fuckwitted true believer fed it to you, and you thought it was clever.
Obviously not
Obviously it *is*, Fuckwit - you did not think this cracKKKer bullshit
up yourself, Fuckwit - it was spoon-fed to you.
Post by d***@.
, Fuckwit. You didn't think of it yourself
I pointed that out to you with
No, Fuckwit - *I* pointed it out to *you* and everyone else, Fuckwit.
You were pretending you had thought of this bit of bullshit yourself,
and I pointed out that you did not.

Who fed it to you, Fuckwit?
Post by d***@.
, and you didn't
find it by doing research. Some other fuckwitted true believer fed it
to you, and you thought it was clever.
Who was it, Fuckwit?
LOL!!! You're
Who fed you the bullshit, Fuckwit?
Post by d***@.
Post by d***@.
As I pointed out
No, Fuckwit. You do not "point out" - ever.
عبدلله
2011-11-01 21:40:54 UTC
Permalink
I seek refuge in Allah from the accursed Satan

Name of Allah, the Merciful

Allah, CREATED THE UNIVERSE FROM NOTHING

http://allah-created-the-universe.blogspot.com/

THE COLLAPSE OF THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION IN 20 QUESTIONS

http://newaninvitationtothetruth.blogspot.com/

((( Acquainted With Islam )))

http://aslam-ahmd.blogspot.com/

http://acquaintedwithislam.maktoobblog.com/

O Jesus, son of Mary! Is thy Lord able to send down for us a table
spread with food from heaven?

http://jesussonofmary1432.blogspot.com/

___________________________________________________

http://www.islamhouse.com/
Loading...