social evolution

[Dale]

if man is a "social" species wouldn't you say that free enterprise would
be the beginning and not the end or the means to the end?

wouldn't "social"-ism be the end, and means to the end?

seems like the means of being "social" is kind of constant, its just the
regulation that is evolving/changing

<maximize_production>

declare supply and demand as economics
declare labor as a subset of economics
declare production as the fruit of labor, supply
declare the value of money as only an instrument except the cost to
produce it

while (demand) and (labor) and (money)
reward the jobs wanted least most
reward the jobs wanted more least
endwhile

</maximize_production>

I think my script to maximize_production would result in a very quick
addition of other considerations like skill, geography, etc.


maybe you only do it for government owned, and publicly traded enterprise

[%]

Post by Dale
if man is a "social" species wouldn't you say that free enterprise
would be the beginning and not the end or the means to the end?
wouldn't "social"-ism be the end, and means to the end?
seems like the means of being "social" is kind of constant, its just
the regulation that is evolving/changing
<maximize_production>
declare supply and demand as economics
declare labor as a subset of economics
declare production as the fruit of labor, supply
declare the value of money as only an instrument except the cost to
produce it
while (demand) and (labor) and (money)
reward the jobs wanted least most
reward the jobs wanted more least
endwhile
</maximize_production>
I think my script to maximize_production would result in a very quick
addition of other considerations like skill, geography, etc.
maybe you only do it for government owned, and publicly traded
enterprise

it's a self invitation , you do it and so shall i

[Checkmate, DoW #1]

Post by Dale
if man is a "social" species wouldn't you say that free enterprise would
be the beginning and not the end or the means to the end?
wouldn't "social"-ism be the end, and means to the end?
seems like the means of being "social" is kind of constant, its just the
regulation that is evolving/changing
<maximize_production>
declare supply and demand as economics
declare labor as a subset of economics
declare production as the fruit of labor, supply
declare the value of money as only an instrument except the cost to
produce it
while (demand) and (labor) and (money)
reward the jobs wanted least most
reward the jobs wanted more least
endwhile
</maximize_production>
I think my script to maximize_production would result in a very quick
addition of other considerations like skill, geography, etc.
maybe you only do it for government owned, and publicly traded enterprise

Are you trying to get all philosophical and shit on Usenet?

[raven1]

On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:42:15 -0400, Dale <***@dalekelly.org> wrote:

Dude, don't Bogart that joint.

Post by Dale
if man is a "social" species wouldn't you say that free enterprise would
be the beginning and not the end or the means to the end?
wouldn't "social"-ism be the end, and means to the end?
seems like the means of being "social" is kind of constant, its just the
regulation that is evolving/changing
<maximize_production>
declare supply and demand as economics
declare labor as a subset of economics
declare production as the fruit of labor, supply
declare the value of money as only an instrument except the cost to
produce it
while (demand) and (labor) and (money)
reward the jobs wanted least most
reward the jobs wanted more least
endwhile
</maximize_production>
I think my script to maximize_production would result in a very quick
addition of other considerations like skill, geography, etc.
maybe you only do it for government owned, and publicly traded enterprise