Discussion:
no quantum zero point matter/energy?
(too old to reply)
Dale
2015-06-29 02:39:45 UTC
Permalink
as discussed in thread with
Message-ID: <***@news.alt.net>

you can't have random events and determinism

I'm not saying I believe in determinism, I'm just saying my time on this
group has shown those who espouse the combination that can't be assuming
logic

the same applies to quantum zero-point matter/energy, there can't be
random matter/energy and determinism

the only evidence for zero-point matter/energy is the Casimir Effect,
which fails at having a zero because it doesn't have a perfect vacuum,
it has an apparatus trying to have vacuum and plates within it, true
zero-point has no apparatus or plates

again, I'm not saying it can't be, there would have to be distinction
drawn between randomness and determinism, and/or the acceptance that
illogic exists

if illogic is a material concept in a material brain, and although a
concept might not be an actualization, it IS something material, unless
there is no illogic and only broad abstractions, no illogic would mean
no randomness
--
Dale
http://www.dalekelly.org
Olrik
2015-06-29 03:28:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dale
as discussed in thread with
you can't have random events and determinism
I'm not saying I believe in determinism, I'm just saying my time on this
group has shown those who espouse the combination that can't be assuming
logic
the same applies to quantum zero-point matter/energy, there can't be
random matter/energy and determinism
the only evidence for zero-point matter/energy is the Casimir Effect,
which fails at having a zero because it doesn't have a perfect vacuum,
it has an apparatus trying to have vacuum and plates within it, true
zero-point has no apparatus or plates
again, I'm not saying it can't be, there would have to be distinction
drawn between randomness and determinism, and/or the acceptance that
illogic exists
if illogic is a material concept in a material brain, and although a
concept might not be an actualization, it IS something material, unless
there is no illogic and only broad abstractions, no illogic would mean
no randomness
HELP!

Is there *anything* in Dale's post that deals with bacon? I'm at lost.
--
Olrik
aa #1981
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
Bob Casanova
2015-06-29 17:48:19 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 23:28:09 -0400, the following appeared
Post by Olrik
Post by Dale
as discussed in thread with
you can't have random events and determinism
I'm not saying I believe in determinism, I'm just saying my time on this
group has shown those who espouse the combination that can't be assuming
logic
the same applies to quantum zero-point matter/energy, there can't be
random matter/energy and determinism
the only evidence for zero-point matter/energy is the Casimir Effect,
which fails at having a zero because it doesn't have a perfect vacuum,
it has an apparatus trying to have vacuum and plates within it, true
zero-point has no apparatus or plates
again, I'm not saying it can't be, there would have to be distinction
drawn between randomness and determinism, and/or the acceptance that
illogic exists
if illogic is a material concept in a material brain, and although a
concept might not be an actualization, it IS something material, unless
there is no illogic and only broad abstractions, no illogic would mean
no randomness
HELP!
Is there *anything* in Dale's post that deals with bacon?
Nope; it's all word salad with no toppings.
Post by Olrik
I'm at lost.
So is he. In "a maze of twisty passages, all alike".
--
Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov
Loading...