Discussion:
Bill Gates unwittingly reveals true purpose of vaccinations - to reduce world population
(too old to reply)
Andrew W
2017-05-18 09:27:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Spread this information far and wide.

Bill Gates unwittingly reveals true purpose of vaccinations - to reduce
world population.
And the corrupt U.S. government supports him.
The pharmaceutical corporations, rich families and bankers are behind this
long term treacherous plan, a plan which also includes continuing wars,
releases of infectious diseases, and manipulation of the world food supply.
Time to get rid of these traitors to humanity.


http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html


(NaturalNews) In a recent TED conference presentation, Microsoft billionaire
Bill Gates, who has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to new vaccine
efforts, speaks on the issue of CO2 emissions and its effects on climate
change. He presents a formula for tracking CO2 emissions as follows: CO2 = P
x S x E x C.

P = People
S = Services per person
E = Energy per service
C = CO2 per energy unit

Then he adds that in order to get CO2 to zero, "probably one of these
numbers is going to have to get pretty close to zero."

Following that, Bill Gates begins to describe how the first number -- P (for
People) -- might be reduced. He says:

"The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9
billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care,
reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15
percent."

You can watch this yourself at:
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A155D113455FAC882A3290536575C723

Reducing the world population through vaccines.
This statement by Bill Gates was not made with any hesitation, stuttering or
other indication that it might have been a mistake. It appears to have been
a deliberate, calculated part of a well developed and coherent presentation.

So what does it mean when Bill Gates says "if we do a really great job on
new vaccines... we could lower [world population] by 10 or 15 percent?"

Clearly, this statement implies that vaccines are a method of population
reduction. So is "health care," which all NaturalNews readers already know
to be more of a "sick care" system that actually harms more people than it
helps.

Perhaps that's the whole point of it. Given that vaccines technology help
almost no one from a scientific point of view
(http://www.naturalnews.com/029641_vaccines_junk_science.html), it raises
the question: For what purpose are vaccines being so heavily pushed in the
first place?

Bill Gates seems to be saying that one of the primary purposes is to reduce
the global population as a mechanism by which we can reduce CO2 emissions.
Once again, watch the video yourself to hear him say it in his own words:
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A155D113455FAC882A3290536575C723

How can vaccines actually be used to reduce world population?
Let's conduct a mental experiment on this issue. If vaccines are to be used
to reduce world population, they obviously need to be accepted by the
majority of the people. Otherwise the population reduction effort wouldn't
be very effective.

And in order for them to be accepted by the majority of the people, they
obviously can't just kill people outright. If everybody started dropping
dead within 24 hours of receiving the flu shot, the danger of vaccines would
become obvious rather quickly and the vaccines would be recalled.

Thus, if vaccines are to be used as an effective population reduction
effort, there are really only three ways in which they might theoretically
be "effective" from the point of view of those who wish to reduce world
population:

#1) They might kill people slowly in a way that's unnoticeable, taking
effect over perhaps 10 - 30 years by accelerating degenerative diseases.

#2) They might reduce fertility and therefore dramatically lower birth rates
around the world, thereby reducing the world population over successive
generations. This "soft kill" method might seem more acceptable to
scientists who want to see the world population fall but don't quite have
the stomach to outright kill people with conventional medicine. There is
already evidence that vaccines may promote miscarriages
(http://www.naturalnews.com/027512_vaccines_miscarriage.html).

#3) They might increase the death rate from a future pandemic.
Theoretically, widespread vaccination efforts could be followed by a
deliberate release of a highly virulent flu strain with a high fatality
rate. This "bioweapon" approach could kill millions of people whose immune
systems have been weakened by previous vaccine injections.

This is a known side effect of some vaccines, by the way. A study
documenting this was published in PLoS. Read the story here:
http://www.naturalnews.com/028538_seasonal_flu_shot_vaccines.html

Here's the study title and citation: Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination
Increase the Risk of Illness with the 2009 A/H1N1 Pandemic Virus?
Viboud C, Simonsen L (2010) Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Increase the
Risk of Illness with the 2009 A/H1N1 Pandemic Virus? PLoS Med 7(4):
e1000259. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000259

The short answer is yes, seasonal flu vaccines do cause increased
susceptibility to the H1N1 pandemic virus. In other words, seasonal flu
vaccines could set up the population for a "hard kill" pandemic that could
wipe out a significant portion of the global population (perhaps 10 to 15
percent, as Bill Gates suggested).

Conveniently, their deaths could be blamed on the pandemic, thereby
diverting blame from those who were really responsible for the plot. As yet
another beneficial side effect for the global population killers, the
widespread deaths could be used as a fear tool to urge more people to get
vaccinated yet again, and the entire cycle could be repeated until world
population was brought down to whatever manageable level was desired... all
in the name of health care!

The more people around the world are vaccinated before the release of the
"hard kill" pandemic virus, the more powerful the effect of this approach.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Perhaps not coincidentally, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has
funneled hundreds of millions of dollars into vaccine programs targeting
people all over the world. One such program is researching the development
of "sweat-triggered vaccines" that could use specially-coated nano-materials
to deliver vaccines to people without using injections.

More interestingly, his foundation has also invested millions in
sterilization technologies that have been called a "temporary castration"
solution. (http://www.naturalnews.com/028887_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html)

It seems that the actions of the Gates foundation are entirely consistent
with the formula for CO2 reduction that Bill Gates eluded to in his TED
conference speech: CO2 = P x S x E x C.

By reducing birth rates (through sterilization technologies) and increasing
vaccine penetration throughout the world population (by using
sweat-triggered nano-vaccines), his stated goal of reducing the world
population by 10 to 15 percent could be reached within just a few years.

Who will be left alive? The smart people
The interesting thing about all this is that this campaign to reduce global
population through vaccines will obviously not impact people who consciously
avoid vaccines. And those people, by and large, tend to be the more
intelligent, capable people who actually have an improved ability to move
human civilization forward with thoughtful consideration.

I can only imagine that those people designing this vaccine-induced
population control measure might be sitting around a table chuckling to
themselves and saying, "It's only the stupid people that are going to be
killed off anyway, so this is actually helping the future of humankind!"
(Their words, not mine.)

In a weird world government kind of way, this effort might actually be based
on some distorted vision of philanthropy where some of the most powerful
people in the world quite literally believe the way to save humanity is to
kill off as many of the gullible people as possible. Vaccines are, in
effect, an "evil genius" kind of way to conduct an IQ test on the population
at large: If you go get vaccinated every flu season, you're not too bright
and probably don't engage the kind of strong mental faculties that humanity
will no doubt need if it is to face a future where it is now all but obvious
we are not alone in the universe.

If humanity is to save itself from its own destruction and compete as an
uplifted species in our universe, killing off the least intelligent members
of society (or making them infertile) may appear to the world controllers to
be a perfectly reasonable approach. I disagree with that approach, but it
may be precisely what they are thinking.

In any case, choosing to receive a seasonal flu shot is undoubtedly an
admission that you have failed some sort of universal IQ test, whether or
not this is the intention of world influencers such as Bill Gates. More
importantly, it is also a betrayal of your own biology, because it indicates
you don't believe in the ability of your own immune system to protect you
even from mild infections.

Perhaps the world vaccine conspirators figure that if people are willing to
betray themselves anyway, it's not much different for governments and
institutions to betray them as well. In other words, if you don't even care
enough about your own health to take care of your health, why should any
government care about protecting your health, either?

As you ponder this, also consider something else: The U.S. is going broke
due to sick-care costs which are rising dramatically under the new federal
health care reform guidelines. Can you guess the fastest and easiest way to
reduce those health care costs? If you guessed, "unleash a hard-kill
pandemic that takes out a significant portion of the weak or sick people"
then you guessed right. Sadly, killing off those most vulnerable to sickness
could save the U.S. government literally billions of dollars in sick-care
expenditures. Plus, it would save Social Security yet more billions by
avoiding ongoing monthly payouts. (Again, I am completely against such an
approach because I value human life, but I also know we live in a world
where the people in charge have little or no respect for human life and will
readily sacrifice human lives to achieve their aims.)

As far as Bill Gates goes, consider his statement in the context of what
we've discussed here: "The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's
headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new
vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by
perhaps 10 or 15 percent."

It suddenly seems to make a lot of sense when you understand that reducing
the population reduces CO2 emissions, and using more vaccines on more people
increases the death rate of the population.

My advice? Try to avoid being among those 10 to 15 percent who get culled
through global vaccine programs. You will not only save your life, you'll
also pass the "universal IQ test" which determines whether you're smart
enough to know that injecting your body with chemicals and viral fragments
in order to stop "seasonal flu" is a foolish endeavor.

Be healthy and wise, and you'll survive the world depopulation effort that
victimizes conventional thinkers who don't have the intelligence to question
what they're being told to do by their own corrupt governments.
It's now more important than ever to have a backup emergency food supply

With the constant threat of homegrown terror attacks, the North Korea
threat, and experts concerned about imminent earthquakes in California, it
makes sense to have a backup emergency food supply. Numanna Organic Family
Packs and Ranger Bucket Organic Emergency Storable Food contain uniquely
clean, lab-verified, storable organic food -- without the toxins,
preservatives, chemicals, and poisons found in mainstream survival food. Arm
yourself with the best today.

http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-05-18 10:08:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew W
Spread this information far and wide.
Bill Gates unwittingly reveals true purpose of vaccinations - to reduce
world population.
And the corrupt U.S. government supports him....
The true purpose of vaccination is to protect you from dangerous
diseases. If you don't trust them, you better leave the country that
requires them.
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Andrew W
2017-05-18 11:29:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew W
Spread this information far and wide.
Bill Gates unwittingly reveals true purpose of vaccinations - to reduce
world population.
And the corrupt U.S. government supports him....
The true purpose of vaccination is to protect you from dangerous diseases.
What dangerous diseases? There are none around here. This is the 21st
century and we are not living in third world countries.
If you don't trust them, you better leave the country that requires them.
No country requires any such thing. Only corrupt governments and
pharmaceutical corporations. It's far better that we get together and remove
these traitors from power.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-05-18 12:46:59 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew W
What dangerous diseases? There are none around here. This is the 21st
century and we are not living in third world countries.
Have you ever worked in dirty places, e.g. farmland or cattle farm? The
number of infectious diseases could scare you!
Post by Andrew W
No country requires any such thing. Only corrupt governments and
pharmaceutical corporations. It's far better that we get together and
remove these traitors from power.
You don't happen to live in clean temples and churches if not concrete
buildings, do you? And you forgot about reality and NATURE?
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Andrew W
2017-05-18 13:30:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by Andrew W
What dangerous diseases? There are none around here. This is the 21st
century and we are not living in third world countries.
Have you ever worked in dirty places, e.g. farmland or cattle farm? The
number of infectious diseases could scare you!
Funny then how most farmers are very healthy people.
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by Andrew W
No country requires any such thing. Only corrupt governments and
pharmaceutical corporations. It's far better that we get together and
remove these traitors from power.
You don't happen to live in clean temples and churches if not concrete
buildings, do you? And you forgot about reality and NATURE?
I live in the suburbs and there are no problems with rampant diseases. The
governments and mainstream (fake) media are lying.
This is purely about money and population control.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-05-18 13:51:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew W
Funny then how most farmers are very healthy people.
I don't now your country then. Do you really know the danger of soil?
Post by Andrew W
I live in the suburbs and there are no problems with rampant diseases.
The governments and mainstream (fake) media are lying.
This is purely about money and population control.
Mind to reveal your country's name? Japan?

Denying your country's kids from vaccination definitely make it A LOT
easier for your government to kill them. ;)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Andrew W
2017-05-18 23:25:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by Andrew W
Funny then how most farmers are very healthy people.
I don't now your country then. Do you really know the danger of soil?
Yes but we have what's called an immune system. Have you heard that children
that are allowed to play in the mud end up with stronger immune systems?
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by Andrew W
I live in the suburbs and there are no problems with rampant diseases.
The governments and mainstream (fake) media are lying.
This is purely about money and population control.
Mind to reveal your country's name? Japan?
Australia.
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Denying your country's kids from vaccination definitely make it A LOT
easier for your government to kill them. ;)
Did you know that it's the governments/pharma corps that are spreading these
old diseases? Ask yourself why old diseases that were eradicated decades or
centuries ago would suddenly come back out of the blue in this modern age of
medicine and hygiene?
Sylvia Else
2017-05-18 12:46:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew W
Thus, if vaccines are to be used as an effective population reduction
effort, there are really only three ways in which they might
theoretically be "effective" from the point of view of those who wish to
#1) They might kill people slowly in a way that's unnoticeable, taking
effect over perhaps 10 - 30 years by accelerating degenerative diseases.
#2) They might reduce fertility and therefore dramatically lower birth
rates around the world, thereby reducing the world population over
successive generations. This "soft kill" method might seem more
acceptable to scientists who want to see the world population fall but
don't quite have the stomach to outright kill people with conventional
medicine. There is already evidence that vaccines may promote
miscarriages (http://www.naturalnews.com/027512_vaccines_miscarriage.html).
#3) They might increase the death rate from a future pandemic.
Theoretically, widespread vaccination efforts could be followed by a
deliberate release of a highly virulent flu strain with a high fatality
rate. This "bioweapon" approach could kill millions of people whose
immune systems have been weakened by previous vaccine injections.
He's not saying it will reduce the population, he's saying it will
reduce the increase in population.

It is a well established phenomenon that as public health improves,
people have lower numbers of children. Not because their innate
fertility has been reduced, but because they no longer feel the need to
produce large numbers of children to ensure that at least some will
remain alive to support their parents in old age.

Indeed, it is exactly this effect that will ultimately lead to the world
population stabilising.

Those who want to read between the lines should do their research first.

Sylvia.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-05-18 14:00:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Sylvia Else
He's not saying it will reduce the population, he's saying it will
reduce the increase in population.
Then I would like to ask:

Why must a country's population increase?
For wars and invasion into other countries??
For spreading religions?

For making and training more SLAVES? ;)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Andrew W
2017-05-19 00:41:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew W
Thus, if vaccines are to be used as an effective population reduction
effort, there are really only three ways in which they might
theoretically be "effective" from the point of view of those who wish to
#1) They might kill people slowly in a way that's unnoticeable, taking
effect over perhaps 10 - 30 years by accelerating degenerative diseases.
#2) They might reduce fertility and therefore dramatically lower birth
rates around the world, thereby reducing the world population over
successive generations. This "soft kill" method might seem more
acceptable to scientists who want to see the world population fall but
don't quite have the stomach to outright kill people with conventional
medicine. There is already evidence that vaccines may promote
miscarriages
(http://www.naturalnews.com/027512_vaccines_miscarriage.html).
#3) They might increase the death rate from a future pandemic.
Theoretically, widespread vaccination efforts could be followed by a
deliberate release of a highly virulent flu strain with a high fatality
rate. This "bioweapon" approach could kill millions of people whose
immune systems have been weakened by previous vaccine injections.
He's not saying it will reduce the population, he's saying it will reduce
the increase in population.
I didn't see or hear that.

Quote.
"The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9
billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care,
reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15
percent."

So what does it mean when Bill Gates says "if we do a really great job on
new vaccines... we could lower [world population] by 10 or 15 percent?"
Clearly, this statement implies that vaccines are a method of population
reduction.

This is clear contradiction in terms because vaccines are supposed to
increase life expectancy, not reduce it.

Many don't know that Bill Gates has connections with wealthy globalists that
have agendas to harm and control the human race. They see the human race as
nothing but a resource to be used.
Bill Gates' father, William H. Gates Sr., has long been involved with the
eugenics group Planned Parenthood, a rebranded organization birthed out of
the American Eugenics Society.
In a 2003 interview with PBS' Bill Moyers, Bill Gates admitted that his
father used to be the head of Planned Parenthood, which was founded on the
concept that most human beings are just "reckless breeders" and "human
weeds" in need of culling
(http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcript_gates.html).

Read rest on
http://www.naturalnews.com/035105_Bill_Gates_Monsanto_eugenics.html
It is a well established phenomenon that as public health improves, people
have lower numbers of children. Not because their innate fertility has been
reduced, but because they no longer feel the need to produce large numbers
of children to ensure that at least some will remain alive to support their
parents in old age.
Many people don't think that way. In fact many people don't think at all.
They just follow the rest of the heard and have children because everyone
else is.
Indeed, it is exactly this effect that will ultimately lead to the world
population stabilising.
The population is constantly increasing. It's 7.5 billion now and climbing.

See World Population Clock. http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/

The only proper way to control over-population is with education about
over-population and limited available resources. Unfortunately the religious
community won't listen. They just follow the religious texts that say "go
forth and multiply".
Those who want to read between the lines should do their research first.
Sylvia.
Sylvia Else
2017-05-19 01:38:24 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew W
Post by Sylvia Else
Post by Andrew W
Thus, if vaccines are to be used as an effective population reduction
effort, there are really only three ways in which they might
theoretically be "effective" from the point of view of those who wish to
#1) They might kill people slowly in a way that's unnoticeable, taking
effect over perhaps 10 - 30 years by accelerating degenerative diseases.
#2) They might reduce fertility and therefore dramatically lower birth
rates around the world, thereby reducing the world population over
successive generations. This "soft kill" method might seem more
acceptable to scientists who want to see the world population fall but
don't quite have the stomach to outright kill people with conventional
medicine. There is already evidence that vaccines may promote
miscarriages
(http://www.naturalnews.com/027512_vaccines_miscarriage.html).
#3) They might increase the death rate from a future pandemic.
Theoretically, widespread vaccination efforts could be followed by a
deliberate release of a highly virulent flu strain with a high fatality
rate. This "bioweapon" approach could kill millions of people whose
immune systems have been weakened by previous vaccine injections.
He's not saying it will reduce the population, he's saying it will
reduce the increase in population.
I didn't see or hear that.
Quote.
"The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9
billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care,
reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15
percent."
So what does it mean when Bill Gates says "if we do a really great job
on new vaccines... we could lower [world population] by 10 or 15 percent?"
Clearly, this statement implies that vaccines are a method of population
reduction.
This is clear contradiction in terms because vaccines are supposed to
increase life expectancy, not reduce it.
I've already explained how increasing health (and thereby increasing
life expectancy) leads to lower birth rates. It's the increase that's
reduced, because fewer people are born, but those that are live longer.
Post by Andrew W
Many don't know that Bill Gates has connections with wealthy globalists
that have agendas to harm and control the human race. They see the human
race as nothing but a resource to be used.
Bill Gates' father, William H. Gates Sr., has long been involved with
the eugenics group Planned Parenthood, a rebranded organization birthed
out of the American Eugenics Society.
In a 2003 interview with PBS' Bill Moyers, Bill Gates admitted that his
father used to be the head of Planned Parenthood, which was founded on
the concept that most human beings are just "reckless breeders" and
"human weeds" in need of culling
(http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcript_gates.html).
Read rest on
http://www.naturalnews.com/035105_Bill_Gates_Monsanto_eugenics.html
Post by Sylvia Else
It is a well established phenomenon that as public health improves,
people have lower numbers of children. Not because their innate
fertility has been reduced, but because they no longer feel the need
to produce large numbers of children to ensure that at least some will
remain alive to support their parents in old age.
Many people don't think that way. In fact many people don't think at
all. They just follow the rest of the heard and have children because
everyone else is.
It is an observed outcome.
Post by Andrew W
Post by Sylvia Else
Indeed, it is exactly this effect that will ultimately lead to the
world population stabilising.
The population is constantly increasing. It's 7.5 billion now and climbing.
Yes, and it will continue for some time. It will not continue to climb
indefinitely. As good health and relative affluence become the norm, the
number of children born will drop. Eventually, it will reach replacement
level, and about 50 years after that the population will stabilise.

Actually, the population may start to drop. Some rich countries aren't
even reproducing at the replacement level.

Sylvia.
BDK
2017-05-18 14:20:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
In article <ofjp8a$nr0$***@dont-email.me>, ***@optusnet.com.au
says...
Post by Andrew W
Spread this information far and wide.
Bill Gates unwittingly reveals true purpose of vaccinations - to reduce
world population.
And the corrupt U.S. government supports him.
The pharmaceutical corporations, rich families and bankers are behind this
long term treacherous plan, a plan which also includes continuing wars,
releases of infectious diseases, and manipulation of the world food supply.
Time to get rid of these traitors to humanity.
http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html
(NaturalNews) In a recent TED conference presentation, Microsoft billionaire
Bill Gates, who has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to new vaccine
efforts, speaks on the issue of CO2 emissions and its effects on climate
change. He presents a formula for tracking CO2 emissions as follows: CO2 = P
x S x E x C.
P = People
S = Services per person
E = Energy per service
C = CO2 per energy unit
Then he adds that in order to get CO2 to zero, "probably one of these
numbers is going to have to get pretty close to zero."
Following that, Bill Gates begins to describe how the first number -- P (for
"The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9
billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care,
reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15
percent."
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A155D113455FAC882A3290536575C723
Reducing the world population through vaccines.
This statement by Bill Gates was not made with any hesitation, stuttering or
other indication that it might have been a mistake. It appears to have been
a deliberate, calculated part of a well developed and coherent presentation.
So what does it mean when Bill Gates says "if we do a really great job on
new vaccines... we could lower [world population] by 10 or 15 percent?"
Clearly, this statement implies that vaccines are a method of population
reduction. So is "health care," which all NaturalNews readers already know
to be more of a "sick care" system that actually harms more people than it
helps.
Perhaps that's the whole point of it. Given that vaccines technology help
almost no one from a scientific point of view
(http://www.naturalnews.com/029641_vaccines_junk_science.html), it raises
the question: For what purpose are vaccines being so heavily pushed in the
first place?
Bill Gates seems to be saying that one of the primary purposes is to reduce
the global population as a mechanism by which we can reduce CO2 emissions.
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A155D113455FAC882A3290536575C723
How can vaccines actually be used to reduce world population?
Let's conduct a mental experiment on this issue. If vaccines are to be used
to reduce world population, they obviously need to be accepted by the
majority of the people. Otherwise the population reduction effort wouldn't
be very effective.
And in order for them to be accepted by the majority of the people, they
obviously can't just kill people outright. If everybody started dropping
dead within 24 hours of receiving the flu shot, the danger of vaccines would
become obvious rather quickly and the vaccines would be recalled.
Thus, if vaccines are to be used as an effective population reduction
effort, there are really only three ways in which they might theoretically
be "effective" from the point of view of those who wish to reduce world
#1) They might kill people slowly in a way that's unnoticeable, taking
effect over perhaps 10 - 30 years by accelerating degenerative diseases.
#2) They might reduce fertility and therefore dramatically lower birth rates
around the world, thereby reducing the world population over successive
generations. This "soft kill" method might seem more acceptable to
scientists who want to see the world population fall but don't quite have
the stomach to outright kill people with conventional medicine. There is
already evidence that vaccines may promote miscarriages
(http://www.naturalnews.com/027512_vaccines_miscarriage.html).
#3) They might increase the death rate from a future pandemic.
Theoretically, widespread vaccination efforts could be followed by a
deliberate release of a highly virulent flu strain with a high fatality
rate. This "bioweapon" approach could kill millions of people whose immune
systems have been weakened by previous vaccine injections.
This is a known side effect of some vaccines, by the way. A study
http://www.naturalnews.com/028538_seasonal_flu_shot_vaccines.html
Here's the study title and citation: Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination
Increase the Risk of Illness with the 2009 A/H1N1 Pandemic Virus?
Viboud C, Simonsen L (2010) Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Increase the
e1000259. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000259
The short answer is yes, seasonal flu vaccines do cause increased
susceptibility to the H1N1 pandemic virus. In other words, seasonal flu
vaccines could set up the population for a "hard kill" pandemic that could
wipe out a significant portion of the global population (perhaps 10 to 15
percent, as Bill Gates suggested).
Conveniently, their deaths could be blamed on the pandemic, thereby
diverting blame from those who were really responsible for the plot. As yet
another beneficial side effect for the global population killers, the
widespread deaths could be used as a fear tool to urge more people to get
vaccinated yet again, and the entire cycle could be repeated until world
population was brought down to whatever manageable level was desired... all
in the name of health care!
The more people around the world are vaccinated before the release of the
"hard kill" pandemic virus, the more powerful the effect of this approach.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Perhaps not coincidentally, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has
funneled hundreds of millions of dollars into vaccine programs targeting
people all over the world. One such program is researching the development
of "sweat-triggered vaccines" that could use specially-coated nano-materials
to deliver vaccines to people without using injections.
More interestingly, his foundation has also invested millions in
sterilization technologies that have been called a "temporary castration"
solution. (http://www.naturalnews.com/028887_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html)
It seems that the actions of the Gates foundation are entirely consistent
with the formula for CO2 reduction that Bill Gates eluded to in his TED
conference speech: CO2 = P x S x E x C.
By reducing birth rates (through sterilization technologies) and increasing
vaccine penetration throughout the world population (by using
sweat-triggered nano-vaccines), his stated goal of reducing the world
population by 10 to 15 percent could be reached within just a few years.
Who will be left alive? The smart people
The interesting thing about all this is that this campaign to reduce global
population through vaccines will obviously not impact people who consciously
avoid vaccines. And those people, by and large, tend to be the more
intelligent, capable people who actually have an improved ability to move
human civilization forward with thoughtful consideration.
I can only imagine that those people designing this vaccine-induced
population control measure might be sitting around a table chuckling to
themselves and saying, "It's only the stupid people that are going to be
killed off anyway, so this is actually helping the future of humankind!"
(Their words, not mine.)
In a weird world government kind of way, this effort might actually be based
on some distorted vision of philanthropy where some of the most powerful
people in the world quite literally believe the way to save humanity is to
kill off as many of the gullible people as possible. Vaccines are, in
effect, an "evil genius" kind of way to conduct an IQ test on the population
at large: If you go get vaccinated every flu season, you're not too bright
and probably don't engage the kind of strong mental faculties that humanity
will no doubt need if it is to face a future where it is now all but obvious
we are not alone in the universe.
If humanity is to save itself from its own destruction and compete as an
uplifted species in our universe, killing off the least intelligent members
of society (or making them infertile) may appear to the world controllers to
be a perfectly reasonable approach. I disagree with that approach, but it
may be precisely what they are thinking.
In any case, choosing to receive a seasonal flu shot is undoubtedly an
admission that you have failed some sort of universal IQ test, whether or
not this is the intention of world influencers such as Bill Gates. More
importantly, it is also a betrayal of your own biology, because it indicates
you don't believe in the ability of your own immune system to protect you
even from mild infections.
Perhaps the world vaccine conspirators figure that if people are willing to
betray themselves anyway, it's not much different for governments and
institutions to betray them as well. In other words, if you don't even care
enough about your own health to take care of your health, why should any
government care about protecting your health, either?
As you ponder this, also consider something else: The U.S. is going broke
due to sick-care costs which are rising dramatically under the new federal
health care reform guidelines. Can you guess the fastest and easiest way to
reduce those health care costs? If you guessed, "unleash a hard-kill
pandemic that takes out a significant portion of the weak or sick people"
then you guessed right. Sadly, killing off those most vulnerable to sickness
could save the U.S. government literally billions of dollars in sick-care
expenditures. Plus, it would save Social Security yet more billions by
avoiding ongoing monthly payouts. (Again, I am completely against such an
approach because I value human life, but I also know we live in a world
where the people in charge have little or no respect for human life and will
readily sacrifice human lives to achieve their aims.)
As far as Bill Gates goes, consider his statement in the context of what
we've discussed here: "The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's
headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new
vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by
perhaps 10 or 15 percent."
It suddenly seems to make a lot of sense when you understand that reducing
the population reduces CO2 emissions, and using more vaccines on more people
increases the death rate of the population.
My advice? Try to avoid being among those 10 to 15 percent who get culled
through global vaccine programs. You will not only save your life, you'll
also pass the "universal IQ test" which determines whether you're smart
enough to know that injecting your body with chemicals and viral fragments
in order to stop "seasonal flu" is a foolish endeavor.
Be healthy and wise, and you'll survive the world depopulation effort that
victimizes conventional thinkers who don't have the intelligence to question
what they're being told to do by their own corrupt governments.
It's now more important than ever to have a backup emergency food supply
With the constant threat of homegrown terror attacks, the North Korea
threat, and experts concerned about imminent earthquakes in California, it
makes sense to have a backup emergency food supply. Numanna Organic Family
Packs and Ranger Bucket Organic Emergency Storable Food contain uniquely
clean, lab-verified, storable organic food -- without the toxins,
preservatives, chemicals, and poisons found in mainstream survival food. Arm
yourself with the best today.
http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html
And you've unwittingly revealed that you're an idiot.

Congrats.
--
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of
Remote Viewing. Level 7 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former
Black Helicopter color consultant.
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-05-18 14:56:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BDK
And you've unwittingly revealed that you're an idiot.
Congrats.
Why do you trust vaccination then? You sure that those self-proclaimed
vaccines are not just saline?

Did you test each syringe of them? Did you check whether those kids
really have immunity boosted? ;)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-05-18 14:57:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by BDK
And you've unwittingly revealed that you're an idiot.
Congrats.
Why do you trust vaccination then? You sure that those self-proclaimed
vaccines are not just saline?
Did you test each syringe of them? Did you check whether those kids
really have immunity boosted? ;)
Who is the real idiot then? ;)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-05-18 15:00:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by BDK
And you've unwittingly revealed that you're an idiot.
Congrats.
Why do you trust vaccination then? You sure that those self-proclaimed
vaccines are not just saline?
Did you test each syringe of them? Did you check whether those kids
really have immunity boosted? ;)
Who is the real idiot then? ;)
BTW, my mp3 player was playing "How Will I Know?" by Whiteley Houston
when I was typing these 2 messages. :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Andrew W
2017-05-19 00:43:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BDK
says...
Post by Andrew W
Spread this information far and wide.
Bill Gates unwittingly reveals true purpose of vaccinations - to reduce
world population.
And the corrupt U.S. government supports him.
The pharmaceutical corporations, rich families and bankers are behind this
long term treacherous plan, a plan which also includes continuing wars,
releases of infectious diseases, and manipulation of the world food supply.
Time to get rid of these traitors to humanity.
http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html
(NaturalNews) In a recent TED conference presentation, Microsoft billionaire
Bill Gates, who has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to new vaccine
efforts, speaks on the issue of CO2 emissions and its effects on climate
change. He presents a formula for tracking CO2 emissions as follows: CO2 = P
x S x E x C.
P = People
S = Services per person
E = Energy per service
C = CO2 per energy unit
Then he adds that in order to get CO2 to zero, "probably one of these
numbers is going to have to get pretty close to zero."
Following that, Bill Gates begins to describe how the first number -- P (for
"The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9
billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care,
reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15
percent."
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A155D113455FAC882A3290536575C723
Reducing the world population through vaccines.
This statement by Bill Gates was not made with any hesitation, stuttering or
other indication that it might have been a mistake. It appears to have been
a deliberate, calculated part of a well developed and coherent presentation.
So what does it mean when Bill Gates says "if we do a really great job on
new vaccines... we could lower [world population] by 10 or 15 percent?"
Clearly, this statement implies that vaccines are a method of population
reduction. So is "health care," which all NaturalNews readers already know
to be more of a "sick care" system that actually harms more people than it
helps.
Perhaps that's the whole point of it. Given that vaccines technology help
almost no one from a scientific point of view
(http://www.naturalnews.com/029641_vaccines_junk_science.html), it raises
the question: For what purpose are vaccines being so heavily pushed in the
first place?
Bill Gates seems to be saying that one of the primary purposes is to reduce
the global population as a mechanism by which we can reduce CO2 emissions.
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A155D113455FAC882A3290536575C723
How can vaccines actually be used to reduce world population?
Let's conduct a mental experiment on this issue. If vaccines are to be used
to reduce world population, they obviously need to be accepted by the
majority of the people. Otherwise the population reduction effort wouldn't
be very effective.
And in order for them to be accepted by the majority of the people, they
obviously can't just kill people outright. If everybody started dropping
dead within 24 hours of receiving the flu shot, the danger of vaccines would
become obvious rather quickly and the vaccines would be recalled.
Thus, if vaccines are to be used as an effective population reduction
effort, there are really only three ways in which they might
theoretically
be "effective" from the point of view of those who wish to reduce world
#1) They might kill people slowly in a way that's unnoticeable, taking
effect over perhaps 10 - 30 years by accelerating degenerative diseases.
#2) They might reduce fertility and therefore dramatically lower birth rates
around the world, thereby reducing the world population over successive
generations. This "soft kill" method might seem more acceptable to
scientists who want to see the world population fall but don't quite have
the stomach to outright kill people with conventional medicine. There is
already evidence that vaccines may promote miscarriages
(http://www.naturalnews.com/027512_vaccines_miscarriage.html).
#3) They might increase the death rate from a future pandemic.
Theoretically, widespread vaccination efforts could be followed by a
deliberate release of a highly virulent flu strain with a high fatality
rate. This "bioweapon" approach could kill millions of people whose immune
systems have been weakened by previous vaccine injections.
This is a known side effect of some vaccines, by the way. A study
http://www.naturalnews.com/028538_seasonal_flu_shot_vaccines.html
Here's the study title and citation: Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination
Increase the Risk of Illness with the 2009 A/H1N1 Pandemic Virus?
Viboud C, Simonsen L (2010) Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Increase the
e1000259. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000259
The short answer is yes, seasonal flu vaccines do cause increased
susceptibility to the H1N1 pandemic virus. In other words, seasonal flu
vaccines could set up the population for a "hard kill" pandemic that could
wipe out a significant portion of the global population (perhaps 10 to 15
percent, as Bill Gates suggested).
Conveniently, their deaths could be blamed on the pandemic, thereby
diverting blame from those who were really responsible for the plot. As yet
another beneficial side effect for the global population killers, the
widespread deaths could be used as a fear tool to urge more people to get
vaccinated yet again, and the entire cycle could be repeated until world
population was brought down to whatever manageable level was desired... all
in the name of health care!
The more people around the world are vaccinated before the release of the
"hard kill" pandemic virus, the more powerful the effect of this approach.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Perhaps not coincidentally, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has
funneled hundreds of millions of dollars into vaccine programs targeting
people all over the world. One such program is researching the development
of "sweat-triggered vaccines" that could use specially-coated
nano-materials
to deliver vaccines to people without using injections.
More interestingly, his foundation has also invested millions in
sterilization technologies that have been called a "temporary castration"
solution. (http://www.naturalnews.com/028887_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html)
It seems that the actions of the Gates foundation are entirely consistent
with the formula for CO2 reduction that Bill Gates eluded to in his TED
conference speech: CO2 = P x S x E x C.
By reducing birth rates (through sterilization technologies) and increasing
vaccine penetration throughout the world population (by using
sweat-triggered nano-vaccines), his stated goal of reducing the world
population by 10 to 15 percent could be reached within just a few years.
Who will be left alive? The smart people
The interesting thing about all this is that this campaign to reduce global
population through vaccines will obviously not impact people who consciously
avoid vaccines. And those people, by and large, tend to be the more
intelligent, capable people who actually have an improved ability to move
human civilization forward with thoughtful consideration.
I can only imagine that those people designing this vaccine-induced
population control measure might be sitting around a table chuckling to
themselves and saying, "It's only the stupid people that are going to be
killed off anyway, so this is actually helping the future of humankind!"
(Their words, not mine.)
In a weird world government kind of way, this effort might actually be based
on some distorted vision of philanthropy where some of the most powerful
people in the world quite literally believe the way to save humanity is to
kill off as many of the gullible people as possible. Vaccines are, in
effect, an "evil genius" kind of way to conduct an IQ test on the population
at large: If you go get vaccinated every flu season, you're not too bright
and probably don't engage the kind of strong mental faculties that humanity
will no doubt need if it is to face a future where it is now all but obvious
we are not alone in the universe.
If humanity is to save itself from its own destruction and compete as an
uplifted species in our universe, killing off the least intelligent members
of society (or making them infertile) may appear to the world controllers to
be a perfectly reasonable approach. I disagree with that approach, but it
may be precisely what they are thinking.
In any case, choosing to receive a seasonal flu shot is undoubtedly an
admission that you have failed some sort of universal IQ test, whether or
not this is the intention of world influencers such as Bill Gates. More
importantly, it is also a betrayal of your own biology, because it indicates
you don't believe in the ability of your own immune system to protect you
even from mild infections.
Perhaps the world vaccine conspirators figure that if people are willing to
betray themselves anyway, it's not much different for governments and
institutions to betray them as well. In other words, if you don't even care
enough about your own health to take care of your health, why should any
government care about protecting your health, either?
As you ponder this, also consider something else: The U.S. is going broke
due to sick-care costs which are rising dramatically under the new federal
health care reform guidelines. Can you guess the fastest and easiest way to
reduce those health care costs? If you guessed, "unleash a hard-kill
pandemic that takes out a significant portion of the weak or sick people"
then you guessed right. Sadly, killing off those most vulnerable to sickness
could save the U.S. government literally billions of dollars in sick-care
expenditures. Plus, it would save Social Security yet more billions by
avoiding ongoing monthly payouts. (Again, I am completely against such an
approach because I value human life, but I also know we live in a world
where the people in charge have little or no respect for human life and will
readily sacrifice human lives to achieve their aims.)
As far as Bill Gates goes, consider his statement in the context of what
we've discussed here: "The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's
headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new
vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by
perhaps 10 or 15 percent."
It suddenly seems to make a lot of sense when you understand that reducing
the population reduces CO2 emissions, and using more vaccines on more people
increases the death rate of the population.
My advice? Try to avoid being among those 10 to 15 percent who get culled
through global vaccine programs. You will not only save your life, you'll
also pass the "universal IQ test" which determines whether you're smart
enough to know that injecting your body with chemicals and viral fragments
in order to stop "seasonal flu" is a foolish endeavor.
Be healthy and wise, and you'll survive the world depopulation effort that
victimizes conventional thinkers who don't have the intelligence to question
what they're being told to do by their own corrupt governments.
It's now more important than ever to have a backup emergency food supply
With the constant threat of homegrown terror attacks, the North Korea
threat, and experts concerned about imminent earthquakes in California, it
makes sense to have a backup emergency food supply. Numanna Organic Family
Packs and Ranger Bucket Organic Emergency Storable Food contain uniquely
clean, lab-verified, storable organic food -- without the toxins,
preservatives, chemicals, and poisons found in mainstream survival food. Arm
yourself with the best today.
http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html
And you've unwittingly revealed that you're an idiot.
Congrats.
Do you know anything about this subject at all?
Bob Officer
2017-05-20 02:29:55 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew W
Post by BDK
says...
Post by Andrew W
Spread this information far and wide.
Bill Gates unwittingly reveals true purpose of vaccinations - to reduce
world population.
And the corrupt U.S. government supports him.
The pharmaceutical corporations, rich families and bankers are behind this
long term treacherous plan, a plan which also includes continuing wars,
releases of infectious diseases, and manipulation of the world food supply.
Time to get rid of these traitors to humanity.
http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html
(NaturalNews) In a recent TED conference presentation, Microsoft billionaire
Bill Gates, who has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to new vaccine
efforts, speaks on the issue of CO2 emissions and its effects on climate
change. He presents a formula for tracking CO2 emissions as follows: CO2 = P
x S x E x C.
P = People
S = Services per person
E = Energy per service
C = CO2 per energy unit
Then he adds that in order to get CO2 to zero, "probably one of these
numbers is going to have to get pretty close to zero."
Following that, Bill Gates begins to describe how the first number -- P (for
"The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9
billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care,
reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15
percent."
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A155D113455FAC882A3290536575C723
Reducing the world population through vaccines.
This statement by Bill Gates was not made with any hesitation, stuttering or
other indication that it might have been a mistake. It appears to have been
a deliberate, calculated part of a well developed and coherent presentation.
So what does it mean when Bill Gates says "if we do a really great job on
new vaccines... we could lower [world population] by 10 or 15 percent?"
Clearly, this statement implies that vaccines are a method of population
reduction. So is "health care," which all NaturalNews readers already know
to be more of a "sick care" system that actually harms more people than it
helps.
Perhaps that's the whole point of it. Given that vaccines technology help
almost no one from a scientific point of view
(http://www.naturalnews.com/029641_vaccines_junk_science.html), it raises
the question: For what purpose are vaccines being so heavily pushed in the
first place?
Bill Gates seems to be saying that one of the primary purposes is to reduce
the global population as a mechanism by which we can reduce CO2 emissions.
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A155D113455FAC882A3290536575C723
How can vaccines actually be used to reduce world population?
Let's conduct a mental experiment on this issue. If vaccines are to be used
to reduce world population, they obviously need to be accepted by the
majority of the people. Otherwise the population reduction effort wouldn't
be very effective.
And in order for them to be accepted by the majority of the people, they
obviously can't just kill people outright. If everybody started dropping
dead within 24 hours of receiving the flu shot, the danger of vaccines would
become obvious rather quickly and the vaccines would be recalled.
Thus, if vaccines are to be used as an effective population reduction
effort, there are really only three ways in which they might
theoretically
be "effective" from the point of view of those who wish to reduce world
#1) They might kill people slowly in a way that's unnoticeable, taking
effect over perhaps 10 - 30 years by accelerating degenerative diseases.
#2) They might reduce fertility and therefore dramatically lower birth rates
around the world, thereby reducing the world population over successive
generations. This "soft kill" method might seem more acceptable to
scientists who want to see the world population fall but don't quite have
the stomach to outright kill people with conventional medicine. There is
already evidence that vaccines may promote miscarriages
(http://www.naturalnews.com/027512_vaccines_miscarriage.html).
#3) They might increase the death rate from a future pandemic.
Theoretically, widespread vaccination efforts could be followed by a
deliberate release of a highly virulent flu strain with a high fatality
rate. This "bioweapon" approach could kill millions of people whose immune
systems have been weakened by previous vaccine injections.
This is a known side effect of some vaccines, by the way. A study
http://www.naturalnews.com/028538_seasonal_flu_shot_vaccines.html
Here's the study title and citation: Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination
Increase the Risk of Illness with the 2009 A/H1N1 Pandemic Virus?
Viboud C, Simonsen L (2010) Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Increase the
e1000259. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000259
The short answer is yes, seasonal flu vaccines do cause increased
susceptibility to the H1N1 pandemic virus. In other words, seasonal flu
vaccines could set up the population for a "hard kill" pandemic that could
wipe out a significant portion of the global population (perhaps 10 to 15
percent, as Bill Gates suggested).
Conveniently, their deaths could be blamed on the pandemic, thereby
diverting blame from those who were really responsible for the plot. As yet
another beneficial side effect for the global population killers, the
widespread deaths could be used as a fear tool to urge more people to get
vaccinated yet again, and the entire cycle could be repeated until world
population was brought down to whatever manageable level was desired... all
in the name of health care!
The more people around the world are vaccinated before the release of the
"hard kill" pandemic virus, the more powerful the effect of this approach.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Perhaps not coincidentally, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has
funneled hundreds of millions of dollars into vaccine programs targeting
people all over the world. One such program is researching the development
of "sweat-triggered vaccines" that could use specially-coated nano-materials
to deliver vaccines to people without using injections.
More interestingly, his foundation has also invested millions in
sterilization technologies that have been called a "temporary castration"
solution. (http://www.naturalnews.com/028887_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html)
It seems that the actions of the Gates foundation are entirely consistent
with the formula for CO2 reduction that Bill Gates eluded to in his TED
conference speech: CO2 = P x S x E x C.
By reducing birth rates (through sterilization technologies) and increasing
vaccine penetration throughout the world population (by using
sweat-triggered nano-vaccines), his stated goal of reducing the world
population by 10 to 15 percent could be reached within just a few years.
Who will be left alive? The smart people
The interesting thing about all this is that this campaign to reduce global
population through vaccines will obviously not impact people who consciously
avoid vaccines. And those people, by and large, tend to be the more
intelligent, capable people who actually have an improved ability to move
human civilization forward with thoughtful consideration.
I can only imagine that those people designing this vaccine-induced
population control measure might be sitting around a table chuckling to
themselves and saying, "It's only the stupid people that are going to be
killed off anyway, so this is actually helping the future of humankind!"
(Their words, not mine.)
In a weird world government kind of way, this effort might actually be based
on some distorted vision of philanthropy where some of the most powerful
people in the world quite literally believe the way to save humanity is to
kill off as many of the gullible people as possible. Vaccines are, in
effect, an "evil genius" kind of way to conduct an IQ test on the population
at large: If you go get vaccinated every flu season, you're not too bright
and probably don't engage the kind of strong mental faculties that humanity
will no doubt need if it is to face a future where it is now all but obvious
we are not alone in the universe.
If humanity is to save itself from its own destruction and compete as an
uplifted species in our universe, killing off the least intelligent members
of society (or making them infertile) may appear to the world controllers to
be a perfectly reasonable approach. I disagree with that approach, but it
may be precisely what they are thinking.
In any case, choosing to receive a seasonal flu shot is undoubtedly an
admission that you have failed some sort of universal IQ test, whether or
not this is the intention of world influencers such as Bill Gates. More
importantly, it is also a betrayal of your own biology, because it indicates
you don't believe in the ability of your own immune system to protect you
even from mild infections.
Perhaps the world vaccine conspirators figure that if people are willing to
betray themselves anyway, it's not much different for governments and
institutions to betray them as well. In other words, if you don't even care
enough about your own health to take care of your health, why should any
government care about protecting your health, either?
As you ponder this, also consider something else: The U.S. is going broke
due to sick-care costs which are rising dramatically under the new federal
health care reform guidelines. Can you guess the fastest and easiest way to
reduce those health care costs? If you guessed, "unleash a hard-kill
pandemic that takes out a significant portion of the weak or sick people"
then you guessed right. Sadly, killing off those most vulnerable to sickness
could save the U.S. government literally billions of dollars in sick-care
expenditures. Plus, it would save Social Security yet more billions by
avoiding ongoing monthly payouts. (Again, I am completely against such an
approach because I value human life, but I also know we live in a world
where the people in charge have little or no respect for human life and will
readily sacrifice human lives to achieve their aims.)
As far as Bill Gates goes, consider his statement in the context of what
we've discussed here: "The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's
headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new
vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by
perhaps 10 or 15 percent."
It suddenly seems to make a lot of sense when you understand that reducing
the population reduces CO2 emissions, and using more vaccines on more people
increases the death rate of the population.
My advice? Try to avoid being among those 10 to 15 percent who get culled
through global vaccine programs. You will not only save your life, you'll
also pass the "universal IQ test" which determines whether you're smart
enough to know that injecting your body with chemicals and viral fragments
in order to stop "seasonal flu" is a foolish endeavor.
Be healthy and wise, and you'll survive the world depopulation effort that
victimizes conventional thinkers who don't have the intelligence to question
what they're being told to do by their own corrupt governments.
It's now more important than ever to have a backup emergency food supply
With the constant threat of homegrown terror attacks, the North Korea
threat, and experts concerned about imminent earthquakes in California, it
makes sense to have a backup emergency food supply. Numanna Organic Family
Packs and Ranger Bucket Organic Emergency Storable Food contain uniquely
clean, lab-verified, storable organic food -- without the toxins,
preservatives, chemicals, and poisons found in mainstream survival food. Arm
yourself with the best today.
http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html
And you've unwittingly revealed that you're an idiot.
Congrats.
Do you know anything about this subject at all?
Yes, you do not understand what you hear.

Lowering the increase in population. Less children needed by born to supply
the elderly with old age services.

Please listen to the two videos in my signature, then go away.
--
Dunning's work explained in clear, concise and simple terms.
John Cleese on Stupidity

Stephen Fry on Dunning Kruger examples:

Bert
2017-05-18 15:06:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew W
http://www.naturalnews.
Funny that you crosspost to "sci.skeptic," since you'll apparently
believe anything.
--
***@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN
Mr. Man-wai Chang
2017-05-18 15:18:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bert
Funny that you crosspost to "sci.skeptic," since you'll apparently
believe anything.
Do you wanna go and die in Mars then? How about the Moon? ;)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
marston shores
2017-05-18 15:57:16 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mr. Man-wai Chang
Post by Bert
Funny that you crosspost to "sci.skeptic," since you'll apparently
believe anything.
Do you wanna go and die in Mars then? How about the Moon? ;)
Do you believe those are reasonable outcomes, or even logical?
Andrew W
2017-05-18 22:46:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bert
Post by Andrew W
http://www.naturalnews.
Funny that you crosspost to "sci.skeptic," since you'll apparently
believe anything.
Wrong.
Loading...