Discussion:
What was " early earth " like according to ' science ' ? Laughable...
(too old to reply)
2016-11-23 11:44:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
http://www.infoplease.com/cig/biology/early-earth-environment.html

Here on this site we have the usual man made universe explained. We note right from the first paragraph the usual and
laughable error of ' science ' arrived at by the usual ' scientific approach ' to discovering facts... ' speculation.'

Scientists conclude that H2O contains no oxygen and therefore we find the poster of this ' scientific approach ' to fact
finding in error. He speaks of " water " but the early earth had no oxygen in it while water can not exist without oxygen as
one part of it's molecule. Crackheads make more sense.

There is no workable explanation of the world we live in other than it is here because the Living God created it by speaking
it into existence. The bottom line is simple enough for a child to grasp but not the ' educated ' Christ hating atheist.
Here's a simple fact of life which passes by the scientist unaware...

Two identical twins. One is in the morgue laying dead on a table while the twin is standing over him. Both persons have a
portion of this element and that element which comprises their both body's except one is alive and one is not. Even a child
can conclude that the dead twin is not dead because of the non-living elements which comprise both the living twin and the
dead twin. Whatever makes one twin alive while the other is dead can certainly not be because of the non-living natural
elements of the earth which comprise both twins. There is no element of life in the Periodic Table.

The only conclusion which can sanely be drawn from this comparison is that life is not of this world... life comes from the
Living God who put of His life into man... man, who is made from the elements of the earth which his dead body testifies
to... the living twin still has the breath of life from God in him while his dead twin brother does not. It's * That *
simple.

As we read... " the dust will return to the earth as it was, and the spirit will return to God who gave it." Ecc.12:7.

It is futile to try and prove otherwise. ' Science, ' has already formulated the Periodic Table in which there is no
' Element of life ' and has already mapped the human body finding only the non-living elements of the earth comprising it. By
' scientific ' methods, the ashes of George Washington can be poured into a bronze cast of old George and add to them as much
water as the human body has in it ( even though ' scientific ' water contains no oxygen according to the poster ) ... wait a
billion years or so and bingo... old George will come busting out because * That * is the ' scientific ' way life comes to be
without the Living God.


The whole duty of man, fallen or elect, is to " fear God, and keep the commandments," Ecc.12:13, as both the lost and the saved " hope and quietly wait for the salvation of the LORD," Lam.3:26

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
%
2016-11-23 18:45:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by ¶
http://www.infoplease.com/cig/biology/early-earth-environment.html
Here on this site we have the usual man made
universe explained. We
note right from the first paragraph the usual
and
laughable error of ' science ' arrived at by the
usual ' scientific
approach ' to discovering facts... '
speculation.'
Scientists conclude that H2O contains no oxygen
and therefore we find
the poster of this ' scientific approach ' to
fact
finding in error. He speaks of " water " but the
early earth had no
oxygen in it while water can not exist without
oxygen as
one part of it's molecule. Crackheads make more
sense.
There is no workable explanation of the world we
live in other than
it is here because the Living God created it by
speaking
it into existence. The bottom line is simple
enough for a child to
grasp but not the ' educated ' Christ hating
atheist.
Here's a simple fact of life which passes by the
scientist unaware...
Two identical twins. One is in the morgue laying
dead on a table
while the twin is standing over him. Both
persons have a
portion of this element and that element which
comprises their both
body's except one is alive and one is not. Even
a child
can conclude that the dead twin is not dead
because of the non-living
elements which comprise both the living twin and
the
dead twin. Whatever makes one twin alive while
the other is dead can
certainly not be because of the non-living
natural
elements of the earth which comprise both twins.
There is no element
of life in the Periodic Table.
The only conclusion which can sanely be drawn
from this comparison is
that life is not of this world... life comes
from the
Living God who put of His life into man... man,
who is made from the
elements of the earth which his dead body
testifies
to... the living twin still has the breath of
life from God in him
while his dead twin brother does not. It's *
That *
simple.
As we read... " the dust will return to the
earth as it was, and the
spirit will return to God who gave it."
Ecc.12:7.
It is futile to try and prove otherwise. '
Science, ' has already
formulated the Periodic Table in which there is
no ' Element of life
' and has already mapped the human body finding
only the non-living
elements of the earth comprising it. By '
scientific ' methods, the
ashes of George Washington can be poured into a
bronze cast of old
George and add to them as much
water as the human body has in it ( even though
' scientific ' water
contains no oxygen according to the poster ) ...
wait a
billion years or so and bingo... old George will
come busting out
because * That * is the ' scientific ' way life
comes to be
without the Living God.
The whole duty of man, fallen or elect, is to "
fear God, and keep
the commandments," Ecc.12:13, as both the lost
and the saved " hope
and quietly wait for the salvation of the LORD,"
Lam.3:26
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast
antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
nice idea for a user name just one caricature
Ted
2016-11-23 23:08:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by %
Post by ¶
http://www.infoplease.com/cig/biology/early-earth-environment.html
Here on this site we have the usual man made > universe explained. We
note right from the first paragraph the usual > and
laughable error of ' science ' arrived at by the > usual ' scientific
approach ' to discovering facts... ' > speculation.'
Scientists conclude that H2O contains no oxygen > and therefore we find
the poster of this ' scientific approach ' to > fact
finding in error. He speaks of " water " but the > early earth had no
oxygen in it while water can not exist without > oxygen as
one part of it's molecule. Crackheads make more > sense.
There is no workable explanation of the world we > live in other than
it is here because the Living God created it by > speaking
it into existence. The bottom line is simple > enough for a child to
grasp but not the ' educated ' Christ hating > atheist.
Here's a simple fact of life which passes by the > scientist unaware...
Two identical twins. One is in the morgue laying > dead on a table
while the twin is standing over him. Both > persons have a
portion of this element and that element which > comprises their both
body's except one is alive and one is not. Even > a child
can conclude that the dead twin is not dead > because of the non-living
elements which comprise both the living twin and > the
dead twin. Whatever makes one twin alive while > the other is dead can
certainly not be because of the non-living > natural
elements of the earth which comprise both twins. > There is no element
of life in the Periodic Table.
The only conclusion which can sanely be drawn > from this comparison is
that life is not of this world... life comes > from the
Living God who put of His life into man... man, > who is made from the
elements of the earth which his dead body > testifies
to... the living twin still has the breath of > life from God in him
while his dead twin brother does not. It's * > That *
simple.
As we read... " the dust will return to the > earth as it was, and the
spirit will return to God who gave it." > Ecc.12:7.
It is futile to try and prove otherwise. ' > Science, ' has already
formulated the Periodic Table in which there is > no ' Element of life
' and has already mapped the human body finding > only the non-living
elements of the earth comprising it. By ' > scientific ' methods, the
ashes of George Washington can be poured into a > bronze cast of old
George and add to them as much
water as the human body has in it ( even though > ' scientific ' water
contains no oxygen according to the poster ) ... > wait a
billion years or so and bingo... old George will > come busting out
because * That * is the ' scientific ' way life > comes to be
without the Living God.
The whole duty of man, fallen or elect, is to " > fear God, and keep
the commandments," Ecc.12:13, as both the lost > and the saved " hope
and quietly wait for the salvation of the LORD," > Lam.3:26
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast > antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
nice idea for a user name just one caricature
LOL.
--
Loading Image... "This troll is one of the
dumbest, most opinionated, most blinkered and also the most arrogant septic
idiots one can come across."
Peter Pan
2016-11-23 18:57:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by ¶
http://www.infoplease.com/cig/biology/early-earth-environment.html
Here on this site we have the usual man made universe explained. We note right from the first paragraph the usual and
laughable error of ' science ' arrived at by the usual ' scientific approach ' to discovering facts... ' speculation.'
Scientists conclude that H2O contains no oxygen and therefore we find the poster of this ' scientific approach ' to fact
finding in error. He speaks of " water " but the early earth had no oxygen in it while water can not exist without oxygen as
one part of it's molecule. Crackheads make more sense.
OMG, you are brilliant! They were obviously not talking
about oxygen MOLECULES, which the early earth did not
have. They really meant that oxygen, the most abundant
element on the planet, was ALL GONE FISHIN!!!
Post by ¶
There is no workable explanation of the world we live in other than it is here because the Living God created it by speaking
it into existence. The bottom line is simple enough for a child to grasp but not the ' educated ' Christ hating atheist.
Here's a simple fact of life which passes by the scientist unaware...
Two identical twins. One is in the morgue laying dead on a table while the twin is standing over him.
If one is dead and one is alive, how can they be
identical?
Post by ¶
Both persons have a
portion of this element and that element which comprises their both body's except one is alive and one is not. Even a child
can conclude that the dead twin is not dead because of the non-living elements which comprise both the living twin and the
dead twin. Whatever makes one twin alive while the other is dead can certainly not be because of the non-living natural
elements of the earth which comprise both twins. There is no element of life in the Periodic Table.
Two "identical" 1999 red Ford F150s. One runs, the other
one doesn't.

They both have the same elements, for fucksake. The
fucked up truck is obviously missing some Einsteinium!!!

The fact that somebody disconnected the distributor wire
in one rig has nothing to do with it.
Post by ¶
The only conclusion which can sanely be drawn from this comparison is that life is not of this world... life comes from the
Living God who put of His life into man... man, who is made from the elements of the earth which his dead body testifies
to... the living twin still has the breath of life from God in him while his dead twin brother does not. It's * That *
simple.
As we read... " the dust will return to the earth as it was, and the spirit will return to God who gave it." Ecc.12:7.
It is futile to try and prove otherwise. ' Science, ' has already formulated the Periodic Table in which there is no
' Element of life ' and has already mapped the human body finding only the non-living elements of the earth comprising it. By
' scientific ' methods, the ashes of George Washington can be poured into a bronze cast of old George and add to them as much
water as the human body has in it ( even though ' scientific ' water contains no oxygen according to the poster ) ... wait a
billion years or so and bingo... old George will come busting out because * That * is the ' scientific ' way life comes to be
without the Living God.
Thanks for pointing all that out, Jasper. Science as we
know it will have to be rewritten. Stand by for a couple
minutes...
Bob Casanova
2016-11-24 16:21:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 02:57:10 +0800, the following appeared
Post by Peter Pan
Post by ¶
http://www.infoplease.com/cig/biology/early-earth-environment.html
Here on this site we have the usual man made universe explained. We note right from the first paragraph the usual and
laughable error of ' science ' arrived at by the usual ' scientific approach ' to discovering facts... ' speculation.'
Scientists conclude that H2O contains no oxygen and therefore we find the poster of this ' scientific approach ' to fact
finding in error. He speaks of " water " but the early earth had no oxygen in it while water can not exist without oxygen as
one part of it's molecule. Crackheads make more sense.
OMG, you are brilliant! They were obviously not talking
about oxygen MOLECULES, which the early earth did not
have. They really meant that oxygen, the most abundant
element on the planet, was ALL GONE FISHIN!!!
He/she/it seems to have chosen an appropriate monicker...
Post by Peter Pan
Post by ¶
There is no workable explanation of the world we live in other than it is here because the Living God created it by speaking
it into existence. The bottom line is simple enough for a child to grasp but not the ' educated ' Christ hating atheist.
Here's a simple fact of life which passes by the scientist unaware...
Two identical twins. One is in the morgue laying dead on a table while the twin is standing over him.
If one is dead and one is alive, how can they be
identical?
Post by ¶
Both persons have a
portion of this element and that element which comprises their both body's except one is alive and one is not. Even a child
can conclude that the dead twin is not dead because of the non-living elements which comprise both the living twin and the
dead twin. Whatever makes one twin alive while the other is dead can certainly not be because of the non-living natural
elements of the earth which comprise both twins. There is no element of life in the Periodic Table.
Two "identical" 1999 red Ford F150s. One runs, the other
one doesn't.
They both have the same elements, for fucksake. The
fucked up truck is obviously missing some Einsteinium!!!
The fact that somebody disconnected the distributor wire
in one rig has nothing to do with it.
Post by ¶
The only conclusion which can sanely be drawn from this comparison is that life is not of this world... life comes from the
Living God who put of His life into man... man, who is made from the elements of the earth which his dead body testifies
to... the living twin still has the breath of life from God in him while his dead twin brother does not. It's * That *
simple.
As we read... " the dust will return to the earth as it was, and the spirit will return to God who gave it." Ecc.12:7.
It is futile to try and prove otherwise. ' Science, ' has already formulated the Periodic Table in which there is no
' Element of life ' and has already mapped the human body finding only the non-living elements of the earth comprising it. By
' scientific ' methods, the ashes of George Washington can be poured into a bronze cast of old George and add to them as much
water as the human body has in it ( even though ' scientific ' water contains no oxygen according to the poster ) ... wait a
billion years or so and bingo... old George will come busting out because * That * is the ' scientific ' way life comes to be
without the Living God.
Thanks for pointing all that out, Jasper. Science as we
know it will have to be rewritten. Stand by for a couple
minutes...
--
Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov
raven1
2016-11-23 22:16:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by ¶
http://www.infoplease.com/cig/biology/early-earth-environment.html
Here on this site we have the usual man made universe explained. We note right from the first paragraph the usual and
laughable error of ' science ' arrived at by the usual ' scientific approach ' to discovering facts... ' speculation.'
Scientists conclude that H2O contains no oxygen
You are as confused as it is possible to be.
Loading...